Recently a famous holy man in the UK was captured by the British police on terrorism charges. This man is a saint ( in Arabic , Awliya-allah ), that is , Allah's friend.This saint's name is Hadhrat Shaykh Asif Hussain Farooqui ( DB ). After his arrest , a miracle happened and the police was forced to release him from the jail. The following information is taken from one of his mureed's ( disciple ) email.
1) When the police arrested Hadhrat sahib they came to his house with a local community leader. There was no commotion, everything was done respectfully. Hadhrat sahib was allowed to take his Quran along with him. The last words of Hadhrat sahib to his son (Maulana Muhammed Farooqui) was, "Make sabr and dua."
2) For two days Hadhrat sahib refused to eat the cell food and the police allowed special food to be brought in.
3) The security officer that stood and watched outside Hadhrat sahibs cell made comments on the third day on how amazing this man was. He said, "Who is this man? He's truly amazing. He's always in meditation, reading his holy book (Quran) or praying (Salah). This man has not slept since his arrival." (Allahu Akbar!) The cells on either side of Hadhrat sahib were emptied out, to make sure no-one disturbs them.
6) On the sixth day 300 people with a roza (fast) stood a silent protest outside the Greater Manchester Police Headquarters in the freezing cold wind and rain from 9am to 930pm.7) In the early part of that protest many birds were visible seen flying in the sky exactly over the protest and the police headquarters, the birds then amazingly formed in a shape to create ALLAH'S name and flew together. A picture of this miracle was taken.
8) Minutes after the release, the head of Manchester Police came out and spoke to the brothers present at the protest. He said the police had never witnessed a well behaved and more organised display of protesters and congratulated the brothers for their cause and success. They apologised for arresting the highly esteemed Shaykh.
21 comments:
"Science is the great antidote to the poison of enthusiasm and superstition" - Adam Smith
"Science, when practiced as the application of man’s God-given talents for the production of appropriate technology on a human scale, relief of misery and
the reverential exploration and appreciation of the glory of Divine Providence as revealed in nature, is a useful tool for mankind.
ScienTISM is science gone mad, which is what we have today.
The reason that science is a bad master and dangerous servant and ought not to be worshipped, is that science is not objective.
Science is fundamentally about the uses of measurement.
What does not fit the yardstick of the scientist is discarded. Scientific determinism has repeatedly excluded some data from
its measurement and fudged other data, such as Piltdown Man, in order to support the self-fulfilling nature of its own agenda, be it Darwinism or “cut,
burn and poison” methods of cancer “treatment” (Hoffman, p. 49 2001)
11, Hoffman, Michael, Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare, Independent History & Research, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, 2001.
one of these days Beelzebub, I pray that pure and simple shame will compel you to put down these backward peasants and upgrade to a better class of plantation resistance....,
f'zample - Nobel laureate physicist Richard P. Feynman:
"There is one feature I notice that is generally missing in "cargo cult science." . . . It's a kind of scientific integrity, a principle of scientific thought that corresponds to a kind of utter honesty—a kind of leaning over backwards. For example, if you're doing an experiment, you should report everything that you think might make it invalid—not only what you think is right about it: other causes that could possibly explain your results; and things you thought of that you've eliminated by some other experiment, and how they worked . . . Details that could throw doubt on your interpretation must be given, if you know them. . . . If you make a theory, for example, and advertise it, or put it out, then you must also put down all the facts that disagree with it, as well as those that agree with it."
Now now Levar Burton Malthus!
Calm down and cease with the knee-jerk 'attack the messenger routine.
Hoffman is no less a viable source for perspective than is that Masonic "Adam Smith" you quoted as if it were scripture.
I know visceral loyalty to the Cpt. James T. Kirk mythology of the 'Infallible White Scientist' is the life blood of you black nerds - but come on bra.
Has scientific determinism not fudged, discarded and excluded data?
Is Scientism not a bad master and a dangerous servant?
Your categorical worship of all things LABELED "Science" is just an egg-head excuse for voluntary servitude.
A polysyllabic excuse to play Plantation Negro.
"I asked them a couple of questions"
“If the Big Bang were indeed where it all began [which one can fairly well grant, at least to this point in science’s thinking], may I ask what preceded the Big Bang?”
Their answer, which I had anticipated, was that the universe was shrunk down to a singularity. I pursued, “But isn’t it correct that a singularity as defined by science is a point at which all the laws of physics break down?”
“That is correct,” was the answer.
“Then, technically, your starting point is not scientific either.”
There was silence, and their expressions betrayed the scurrying mental searches for an escape hatch.
But I had yet another question. I asked if they agreed that when a mechanistic view of the universe had held sway, thinkers like Hume had chided philosophers for taking the principle of causality and applying it to a philosophical argument for the existence of God.
Causality, he warned, could not be extrapolated from science to philosophy.
“Now,” I added, “when quantum theory holds sway, randomness in the subatomic world is made a basis for randomness in life.
Are you not making the very same extrapolation that you warned us against?”
Again there was silence and then one man said with a self-deprecating smile, “We scientists do seem to retain selective sovereignty over what we allow to be transferred to philosophy and what we don’t” (Zacharias, p. 64, 2000).
Has scientific determinism not fudged, discarded and excluded data?
lol..,
Lucifer,
wtf you jawjackin bout?
"scientific determinism"?!?!?!
what is that even supposed to mean?
of course you realize you've just tipped your hand with regard to what you found so fascinating about the equally meaningless gibberish "radical autonomy".
Is Scientism not a bad master and a dangerous servant?
Setting up strawmen and arguing with yourself is the equivalent of masturbation.
your spot though.
Do what you like.
I'm jes sayin,
it's not a good look...,
39, Zacharias, Ravi, Jesus Among Other Gods, Word Publishing, Nashville, Tennessee, 2000.
Caio still hasn't demonstrated to your satisfaction that Livingston's an ignorant hack, huh?
Anyway, enough with the dribs and drabs imp.
Just link the entire ignorant-assed screed and be done with it already!
{pssst, just between you and me Scratch, I sure hope you make money hustling and grinding these backwards, ignorant, new-age jamokes ;^) }
Levaaaaaaar ...
Ait you late for a Star Trek convention or summin?
OK. Levar. Since you gettin' all sensitive to anything that may chip away at your Malthusian biological blob theories let's try a different angle:
Other than silly partisanship what is your objection to this excellent observation? (LOL. My man nails you to a T)
"The cryptocracy has successfully harnessed to its own ends the huge potential for promoting secret political-occult agendas to the public, by presenting them as unassailable, “objective scientific truth.”
Since the bogey of “Science” instills in secularists a sort of blind reverence, opponents of political and occult agendas promoted through the propaganda of scientism, are quickly stigmatized as “Neanderthal,” especially with regard to their opposition to Darwinism, a dogma proved false by Norman Macbeth in his magisterial Darwin Retried and exposed as a cult by Gertrude Himmelfarb in Darwin (Hoffman,
p. 49, 2001).
Naw magne,
Like I told you last time,
I'm still not interested in Lyndon LaRouche's midwest pink pakistani salt franchise.
nerds too smart to fall for that potatohead scam...,
Other than silly partisanship what is your objection to this excellent observation? (LOL. My man nails you to a T)
Mephistopheles,
You realize you just now unintentionally equated me to the messiah?
Fact is, neither you or any of your ignant little imps ever nailed CNu to nothin, much less the Tau cross "T".
Now get behind me Iblis and stop pretending like you've read even one of these little wackazzed fiddy-page books you keep repping.
{we all know better}
Because it's my day, an-alla-dat, I'ma hep you out, aight?
This book here was written by my faculty advisor, a very, very good man who actually knew wtf he was talking about from lived, first-hand access, exposure, and experience to scientistic malfeasance.
Buy it, read it, and learn something useful - something you can use to skillfully and confidently advance the arguments you inartfully keep trying to make.
Caio just finished your boy Livingstone off, once-and-for-all, and with a flourish;
that is because you ignore what esotericism is about, not because you know better. That's just prejudice, your predisposition to deny things are more complex than you have been able to grasp.
perfection perfected....,
Scientific malfeasance? Now that made me laugh for a couple of minutes!
DV, you are insulting Levar Burton by equating him to Malthus. I like Levar Burton and Star Trek.
In any event, I wish that you would subject some of your comments to a more rigorous standard of proof. It seems like you are quick to diss 'plantation medicine' but quick to embrace any New Age newfangled cure without a full investigation of its merits.
Personally, there is reason to question vaccines and the government's intentions etc, but you have to find more people then the usual Dr. Blaylocks and Mercolas (even if they say useful things sometimes).
Then again, perhaps part of your charm is your keen ability to obfuscate and begin rhyming contests, which I find entertaining.
Cnu, your points are valid but you sure are insulting. You ought to critisize people without being so mean. If what you say has merit, it is more likely to be taken seriously if the criticism isn't coated in shit!
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to all of you:)
it's SCIENTISTIC malfeasance, not "scientific" Mahndisa.
If what you say has merit, it is more likely to be taken seriously if the criticism isn't coated in shit!
were I to kindly bend to ease the struggle of peasants in denial of matters too complex for them to grasp, that would blow my whole and entire Malthusian steez, now wouldn't it? ;)
"but you have to find more people then the usual Dr. Blaylocks and Mercolas (even if they say useful things sometimes)." Mahndisa
What's happenin' M?
That's a good point, but I think you have stumbled across something you don't quite grasp yet.
Unlike the Plantation Negros, I am not referencing Mercola or Blaylock as evidence of truth.
I am referencing them as evidence of ideological diversity.
One shouldn't accept something as true because "Blaylock" said it ... any more than they should take something as true because the Plantation (through its myriad of manifestations) said it.
Which is exactly what Plantation Negros do. Even the polysyllabic Plantation Negro cheerleaders hiding behind nerdisms.
So again Mahndisa ... Don't not squirt monkey viruses and adjuvants up your nose BECAUSE Blaylock said not to do so ... don't squirt monkey viruses up your nose BECAUSE you know better.
Plantation Negros have been conditioned not to have faith in themselves. That's why they feel naked without footnotes.
"were I to kindly bend to ease the struggle of peasants in denial of matters too complex for them to grasp"
LOL.
Levaarrrrr.
Scotty needs to beam your black ass up.
Aint nothing particularly difficult to understand about your daily DOOMS DAY predictions and Malthusian conspiracy theories.
If it aint "Peak Oil", it's "Global Warming" it aint "Global Warming", it's "Global Cooling" it aint Global Cooling" it's "Climate Change", if it aint "Climate Change" it's Talking Bacteria with ESP.
And the Malthusian / Masonic / Luciferian message is always the same: "Humans are bad, the world will be better off when they are dead. Keep the abortion machine oiled and primed, warm up the ovens."
Aint nothing particularly difficult to understand about your daily DOOMS DAY predictions and Malthusian conspiracy theories.
lol..,
"my" malthusian conspiracy theories?
Pot meet Kettle.
One finger pointed at me, leaves three fingers pointing back at thee Bro. Scratch.
Rilly doh..., without Luciferian chindribble to peddle, what the heck would you have left to blog about?
{Speaking of which, my boy Caio done yanked ALL THE FOUNDATIONS out from under your Luciferian guru David Livingstone this morning.}
Plantation Negros have been conditioned not to have faith in themselves. That's why they feel naked without footnotes.
jigaboo,
you posted three unattributed footnotes from yo boy pasty Phil right here on this thread alone!!!
That's a good point, but I think you have stumbled across something you don't quite grasp yet.
Unlike the Plantation Negros, I am not referencing Mercola or Blaylock as evidence of truth.
I am referencing them as evidence of ideological diversity.
Sirusly,
let me repeat Mahndisa's attempt to tug your sleeve;
In any event, I wish that you would subject some of your comments to a more rigorous standard of proof. It seems like you are quick to diss 'plantation medicine' but quick to embrace any New Age newfangled cure without a full investigation of its merits.
The curriculum at DenmarkVesey has devolved from potential championing of *ideological* diversity, to a stumbling and bumbling championing of plain old *idiotic* diversity.
You worse than the ole “Sandman” inducing folks to sleep, sleep, sleep.
The last thing in the world that Satan wants is a wide-awake, vigilant, on-fire church.
Repent Beelzebub.
Wake up!!!
CNu church for you.
Levarrrrrr ....
I'm trying my best to understand your point.
Because you've obviously dedicated a TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF TIME to making it. Obviously it's important to you.
Now I know you Negro Nerds like to pretend like you are arguing - to disguise the fact that you are in school.
...
...
But you are in class Levarrr.
Front row.
Middle seat.
Arms folded.
Lips poked out.
You don't really think these little play-fights you keep picking are fooling anybody do you?
If it wasn't school Levarrrrr,
You.
Wouldn't.
Be Here.
More.
Than Me.
You at DenmarkVesey.Net ... more than Denmark Vesey.
...
...
...
Proof?
Since when do Plantation Negros need proof?
Where is the proof that the monkey virus dripping out of the noses of your pork eatin' porch monkeys is less dangerous than the flu?
You 3.95 gpa Negros still eating Walmart crack me up.
LOL
Cnu- nigga puleeze. You just like ribbing folks for the fun of it. I sense a bit of tongue in cheek here. Regardless truth is truth regardless if its covered in a bloddy shitty package!
And scientistic versus scientific? C'mon! Are you having semantic arguments as you so artfully acuse DV of doing via evasion and obfuscation?
Heh!
Anyway, DV if you really were interested in ideological diversity, you'd show the peer reviewed journal articles and the naturopathic articles side by side and point out the consistencies and inconsistencies.
I don't know if its accurate to say that we don't squirt monkey virus juice up our noses because we know better. Actually, the LACK of rigorious scientific justification and the bastardization of statistics in these studies caused me to question them and then discontinue vacs with my son after six months.
Blaylock and Mercola are points of reference but there are obviously others that have important things to say. You have a thick skin so know I am not dissing you; simply just stating the obvious.
I think you bring up valid points, but sometimes bullshit too. I guess everybody does though...
LOL.
"Anyway, DV if you really were interested in ideological diversity, you'd show the peer reviewed journal articles and the naturopathic articles side by side and point out the consistencies and inconsistencies." M
Why?
"Peer reviewed" studies have brought us GMO food, toxic polio vaccines, fake H1N1 pandemics, Viox, The AIDS/HIV MYTH and "Global Government" disguised as "Climate Tax".
WTF does the illusion of "peer reviewed" studies tell us?
Here's what I propose M.
Get an 8 year old who has received all 31 semi-mandatory vaccine shots and raised on a diet of Plantation food and get an 8 year old without the vaccines or GMO processed poison and compare them.
Academically.
Athletically.
Shit. Let 'em fight too.
Then we can see for OURSELVES ... without asking Massa to tell us what to think, behind the ruse of a "peer reviewed study".
"I think you bring up valid points, but sometimes bullshit too." M.
No you don't. You know all my shit is solid. It's just uncomfortable giving 1 cat that much credit. So you gotta act like CNu and pretend to be skeptical.
For example.
Name 1 thing that is bullshit:
_______________________ ?
The most glaring one was the Pink sea salt. I still have yet to see anything that says how the microbe that causes the pink color is beneficial to health.
Don't get me wrong, I use sea salt and kosher salt and vegesalt for various reasons but I don't get the pink stuff.
The fact that you have repeatedly said that HIV is not well defined and is not a virion and nobody has proved it is based upon outdated information ala Christine Maggiore...
The fact that you don't believe that pathogens cause disease but that immune system imbalances are solely to blame...It is a well known fact that out of whack immune systems can leave the body open to infections. BUT if there were no pathogens, there would be no sickness due to bacteria, fungi, protozoa etc and we'd only have mental illness.
I think there are others where your claims are dubious and could be further substantiated.
And claims don't always have to be verified via peer reviewed journals, especially scientists whose ideas are so far out that they aren't accepted...BUT these scientists need to be able to prove their cases via EVIDENCE.
And in some of these cases, I've seen only opinions and anecdotes but very little evidence.
So no, I am not trying to act like Cnu. As a matter of fact I have investigated many things due to your posts;)
Mahndisa,
Not sure that's it's a microbe that turns it pink. Maybe the other minerals?
Post a Comment