Wednesday, December 16, 2009

If You Know Sistas Like I Know Sistas

Whatever went on in that car, Chris was wrong. But this girl got some shit with her.

24 comments:

Big Man said...

True...

But why wasn't Tiger cutting that?

That boy was slipping. For real.

Anonymous said...

so much talent, why did she feel compelled to show her body? She claims she doesn't want people to remember for the incident with Chris Brown. However she wants people to remember her like this?

chosen said...

what talent?

that dude said...

EXACTLY. For Tiger to have no interest....duuuude!

Mahndisa S. Rigmaiden said...

She's just a little girl smelling herself. All women go through that period when they recognize how hot they are and that the WORLD knows it too. Ah the irrationality of youth.

Poor thing; she cannot get a break because she's too damned famous. Seems like fame is a curse to the ungrounded. I think we ought to pray for her sanity;)

the good nurse said...

sista chosen!
girl i was thinking the same thing. this young gal has no talent..at least not related to singing. now i am sure she posesses some talents that are marketable on top of being a pretting girl and a decent model...just dont know what they are.
she has been prostituted by the music industry. sad.

the good nurse said...

*pretty

Denmark Prude Mofo said...

Too much female stuff. No like.

Denmark Prude Mofo said...

She nice 'n light-skinned, though.

IWonderAsIWander said...

Rihanna doesn't do anything for me. I liked when she sang a little Reggae, but she's commercial now. As far her looks, yeah, she'd get it. But I wouldn't come back for seconds. If she has to pose like this to sell records she's basically a whore in my book. Whores don't excite me.

Constructive Feedback said...

DV has the greatest picture collection of honey's on the web!!!


No contest!!!

Denmark Vesey said...

Nah man.

You got it twisted.

Aint no "collection of honey's".

What you are experiencing is a display of art.

Click over Maxim.com and come back.

Sex without soul is pornography.

When sex is as black as I do it, it's a masterpiece.

leslie said...

I agree to disagree with you DV, you have SOME pornography on your site.

Now Rihanna, she cannot sing but she represents where our daughters are headed. She is young and who knows maybe she will change as she ages.

Denmark Vesey said...

Hello Leslie.

Help a brotha out. Where do you see porn?

Anonymous said...

Dv the pictures I like on your site are the ones that show you and your children. Like the one with you and your son, nice. It makes you real.

KonWomyn said...

The human body when sexualized is a form of both porn and art. Representations and interpretations of this body see this in binaristic terms porn/art yet those boundaries are constantly blurred. That which is artistic can be intentionally/ unintentionally elicit a sexual response. In the same way, sometimes that which is designed to sexually excite its audience can be artistic or slip into the realm of trash.

This pic is another example of how commercial music has morphed into an industrial complex; if a young woman wants to sell records she must sell her body in the most provocative ways. Sex sells. And this pic is not just art; a semi naked body with all the sexual inferences is never just art for artsake esp when its Rihanna. She's a fierce fashionista and has some kewl tracks - but she's a kid trying to be xtra edgy for attention, but she constantly cheapens herself and is devoid of all moral sensibilities like in this pic here. Not a good look.

...peace

makheru bradley said...

but she constantly cheapens herself and is devoid of all moral sensibilities like in this pic here--KW

The Base of the Path dominates.

Constructive Feedback said...

[quote]What you are experiencing is a display of art.[/quote]

I'll yield to your artistic eye on that one bro.

Hercules. Hercules!!

RJEsq said...

"this girl got some shit with her..."

Agreed!

RJEsq.

Anonymous said...

D,V your porno pics,there is a bush showing down below she is standing tall and proud to show it and if you keep scrolling down wow, you might want to see what some us have been trying to tell you. It contradicts what you say.

Denmark Vesey said...

Beverly? Porn?

Please.

To reduce that image of Beverly Johnson to "a bush" is intellectually lazy.

I'm not contradicting what I am saying as much as I am challenging what you are thinking.

The nude body in and of itself is not pornography.

In this case it is fine art.

Anonymous said...

Say whatever you want Dv, PORN, or shall I say nudity? OOps nudity, a woman with her botton over a man face, porn.

pink said...

Beautiful and mildly talented. When I think of porn, I think of it as something that is offensive to most and I don't think that pics of beautiful women just standing there or sitting there is offensive. Beverly and Rihanna are both beautiful, unfortunately for Beverly, her pic was taken before women developed the good sense to wax themselves.

Unknown said...

I like it natural