It's been brought to my attention that I am displaying "PORNOGRAPHY" on this site and that it is offensive to some.It never even occurred to me that anyone would ever consider something this beautiful, this soulful and this ... black to be anything other than jaw dropping confirmation that there is but one God. And he is great.
The word derives from the Greek πορνογραφία (pornographia), which derives from the Greek words πόρνη (pornē, "prostitute" and pornea, "prostitution"), and γράφω (graphō, "I write or record," derived meaning "illustration," cf. "graph"), and the suffix -ία (-ia, meaning "state of," "property of," or "place of"), thus meaning "a written description or illustration of prostitutes or prostitution."
The Good Nurse said...
i find the human form beautiful. a masterful demonstration of Gods' handiwork.
the spirit behind pornography is to enslave the viewer....to handcuff them to their most sordid, evil and destructive thoughts.
the art that has been displayed here is not at all of a negative spiritual nature.
some of us are still naked and ashamed.
27 comments:
Nah man...
that's ART.
I guess some people just prefer naked statues in museums to the real thing.
*shrugs*
i find the human form beautiful. a masterful demonstration of Gods' handiwork.
the spirit behind pornography is to enslave the viewer....to handcuff them to their most sordid, evil and destructive thoughts.
the art that has been displayed here is not at all of a negative spiritual nature.
some of us are still naked and ashamed.
That my favorite picture on your blog dude.
You just lifted my spirits.
I think it's the high heels. With the heels it's Leg Show magazine. Take them off and it's a museum piece (er... so to speak).
I don't know about this DV..... If you say so I guess.
I was going to touch on this subject a week ago and never did, but obviously somebody else sees the hypocrisy in your "schooling."
The pictures that are being referenced ARE that of what an overly sexualized, self gratifying teenager would have on display in his locker...
NOT a grown married man with a young son?
Would you be comfortable putting these pictures on your wall in your house? I don't think so, so these are no different then flipping through a porn magazine.
How do you explain these photos on your blog to your son?
Here you are "schooling" on how not to be the sheep, yet you are a sheep...
Obsessed, objectifying women and their bodies.
This is seen in your photos and your blogs:
Photo: woman wearing see-through outfit, legs spread, blowing smoke in the shape of a penis.
"whores for Christmas".... You refer to the models with asses hanging out as whores and then you post a picture of a "sista" with her ass hanging out?
So as long as you are a "sista" with her ass hanging out you are not classified as a whore... A little redundant on my part, but I'm not sure you see your own HYPOCRISY.
Isn't your blogging about seeing the "Truth?"
The truth is blatantly depicted in your pictures and your words. You are suppressing your conflicting sexual lust.
Anonymous seems to make some sense. I wanna see how you are gonna handle that DV.
I'm gonna bet he'll say that he is very comfortable putting these images on the wall in his house, and so that proves either a) anonymous is just wrong about this so anonymous is just wrong wrong wrong about everything OR b) since he is comfortable putting these images up in his house and letting his children see them there and in his blog, they are NOT pornographic.
Then I think he might attack anonymous for saying these words: "Obsessed, objectifying women and their bodies" and say that SHE is the obsessed one and a frustrated feminazi who sees ugliness where there is beauty. Then I give you odds he calls her an ugly bitch to boot, cause that's what those so-called feminists really are...ugly, man-hating bitches who couldn't get a man anyway.
Whaddaya think, will I be wrong or will I be right?
But the real question is....
will he call her a plantation negro?
LOL
What's happenin' phx?
I like you style.
Hello Anonymous. I hear what you are saying. It's not a particularly novel sentiment. I'd say it is safe to say that your average person would come to a pretty much similar conclusion.
Unfortunately this blog has never pretended to appeal to average people.
As you can see, there is a diversity of opinion on this matter as evidenced by the posts here.
I was a little disappointed that you ignored The Good Nurse's brilliant point regarding the spirit of pornography and its relationship to intent.
The woman you refer to below as: "wearing see-through outfit, legs spread, blowing smoke in the shape of a penis" - is Asia Argento an extremely talented Italian actress who communicates much more in that image than mere "sex".
If you peep a couple of her films you may see what I'm talking about.
The images here like the memes are intended to provoke nothing but thought. I can't be held responsible for the titillation of your libido.
But you can take it how you want.
Reading this thread inspired me to review the photos on the site. Lots of good looking men and women represented. No porno that I see.
fyi, I took the Asia A. photo different than you described, DV. First of all, I didn't recognize her. Second of all, she's never been attractive to me. Third, I thought you posted it as a "put down", not a show off.
Thanks DV. I'm partial to you too.
"Quotes:The pictures that are being referenced ARE that of what an overly sexualized, self gratifying teenager would have on display in his locker...
NOT a grow"n married man with a young son?
Here you are "schooling" on how not to be the sheep, yet you are a sheep..."
Coughing about now...
"Isn't your blogging about seeing the "Truth?"
The truth is blatantly depicted in your pictures and your words. You are suppressing your conflicting sexual lust".
Thanks Anon#1 I have been trying to tell Mr. this for some time. Her quotes are exactly what I feel. What message do you want me to think about DV? You keep confusing some of us.
YOU ARE OBJECTIFYING WOMEN ON YOUR BLOG!
All said in much love.
can't be held responsible for the titillation of your libido
Coughing again, probably need some sun Dv, huh?
It's your blog, I will leave at that.
@DV: Maybe the ladies are trying to see you need to post more penis on the page. I'ono, but I doubt if you did prior to this post they wouldn't have much to say about you "objectifying" men.
*Kanye Shrug*
What's up Dude.
I don't usually post with too much "intent".
I'm actually more interested in other peoples interpretation than my own.
Asia Argento is not particularly attractive. But she's very soulful. She's present. She digs herself.
I like that in a woman.
DV said:
"Hello Anonymous. I hear what you are saying. It's not a particularly novel sentiment. I'd say it is safe to say that your average person would come to a pretty much similar conclusion.'
I don't consider myself to be the "average person", if I was I wouldn't be here reading your blog, I would be sitting my fat rear-end on the couch, watching "desperate housewives" cigarette in hand, twenty butts in the ashtray, stuffing my face with Pizza Hut and coke to follow...after standing in line for 2 hours to get my H1N1 shot.
DV said:
"I was a little disappointed that you ignored The Good Nurse's brilliant point regarding the spirit of pornography and its relationship to intent."
Good Nurse's brilliant point:
..the spirit behind pornography is to enslave the viewer....to handcuff them to their most sordid, evil and destructive thoughts.
Isn't this the devil incarnate?
"Lust begets in our souls a distaste for holy things, a perverted conscience, a hatred for God, and it very frequently leads to a complete loss of faith."
Rapists,pedophiles and cheaters are manifestations from their obsession with pornography? Oh, and of course...Mr Woods.
What is the art of a picture (taken from an angle below her booty) of a sista" with her left butt cheek hanging out? What is the "art" of Asia Argento in this picture? What are you insinuating in the picture of Rihanna?
On a supportive note, I believe the human physique is beautiful and should be displayed in a moral manner that depicts that beauty.
Is this art or outright pornographic?
http://www.jsauergallery.com/sagemoon/images/default_images/MB_Manifestation.jpg
Anon,
Keep in mind that for living in a so called "free" country...we are the shall I say....shyest, when it comes to sex and nudity. Here in the old U..S....of A.... it's about sex with the lights off and never let anyone seeing your flaws. go almost ANYWHERE else in the world, and a picture like that may not even get a second glance....and if it did, would certainly not be found to be offensive. Yet you seem so offended by it. It is soooo objectifying......B.S!!..
That is what you have obviously been conditioned to think, and therefor..to judge.
i have a favor of the blog fam...those of you who choose to post anonymously are confusing me...i cannot follow which of you said what. is it possible for you all to make up little names like the rest of us? i would appreciate it.
thanks.
Y'all trying to hold DV to Christian standards of morality.
When did DV ever profess to being a Christian? In fact, homie has consistently denied the veracity of the resurrection.
Y'all trying to chastise him into behaving correctly when he doesn't agree with you on what is correct behavior. That's a loser battle. You have to agree upon standards before you can start calling folks out. If y'all haven't noticed, Denmark tends to be a little vague on overrarching standards outside of a distrust for authority, abhorrence of conformity and general love of women. Beyond that, it changes depending on the day.
Thank you Big Man.
That's a good point.
Denmark Vesey does what the fuck he wants to do.
That's a hard lesson to teach conformists who hide their conformity behind the pretense of "standards".
Beware The Tyranny of The Mediocre.
They tend to want you to reduce your imagination and freedom to the the lowest common denominator - that which they can easily understand.
"Denmark Vesey does what the fuck he wants to do."
This is true, but is that a good thing?
I mean, it would put you at odds with your favorite whiteboy, who generally abhors absolute autonomy.
Personally, I respect a man who establishes a definite set of standards, then evaluates life and his own behavior based on those standards.
That establishes a baseline for acceptbale and unacceptable behavior. Plus, it forces a man to admit when he's wrong, which is necessary for growth.
Actually, I don't think you just do what you want all the time. Matter of fact, since you're married, I know that ain't the case.
What I see as the problem here is that too many cats read the blog and start assuming stuff.
They start assuming that because you say one thing in one instance, you're going to say something else in another instance. Or start assigning you a belief system based on some throwaway comments you make on a post that's more about you trying to display verbal skills then really espouse a life system.
I used to make the same error. I assumed that you when you mentioned God, we were talking about the same person. Or when you called somebody black, it meant the same thing it means for me. But, that was a mistake.
You are quite adept at refusing to expand on all but a few key beliefs.
1. Getting vaccinated is stupid.
2. Eating most plantation foods is stupid.
3. Not having a woman is stupid.
4. Not believing in some form of God is stupid.
5. Conforming is stupid.
6. Denmark Vesey is the blackest man on the Internet. (lol)
There might be a few more core beliefs than that (Gays, porn, politics), but most of the stuff people assume you believe, you've never professed to believing. You tend to leave yourself an out.
Anyway, cats shouldn't care so much about what you believe anyway. The question is can you make a coherent, creative and valid argument. Sometimes you can, and sometimes you can't.
At least the site is typically entertaining.
"At least the site is typically entertaining."
You on a roll Big Man.
That's a very astute observation.
You see, when people think they are learning, they typically are not.
When people think they are being "entertained" ... they are generally being shaped.
The Plantation does it.
I do it.
I laugh at people who attempt to hold me to a greater standard of "proof" or "argument" than they hold the Plantation.
Vaccines
Plantation Food
Not having a woman
Apotheosis disguised as Atheism
Are merely useful examples.
Now. If I can get Plantation Negros to hold the Plantation to the same standards they attempt to hold me ...
My mission is accomplished.
LOL. Imagine cats deconstructing Plantation memes like "Climate Change" and "H1N1 PANDEMIC!" as diligently and with as much chutpah as they deconstruct "GetAChick" and "Monkey Virus Juice".
(Ahhhhh ... I'm so black I'm kissing myself)
Stop lying DV.
You don't care about people holding you and the Plantation to the same standard.
'Cause then everybody would realize that both of y'all are often full of crap.
The Game is the Game.
"The Game is the Game."
"Anonymous"
^^ That's deep. And original.
See what happens when you give Plantation Negros HBO?
They watch 1 episode of The Wire and think they know what Game is.
The only thing offensive is the bush.
Pink..lol
"They tend to want you to reduce your imagination and freedom to the the lowest common denominator - that which they can easily understand."
No, I believe in free will... and with that said,
I never thought you were a christian DV your blog speaks not of a person following greatness. I can justify a lot things. Truth is truth and it not relative either. There are absolutes. People just deny them.
It kills me tthink that people "think" they are talking on a higher plain when I can see clearly the wholes in the arguments.
Now, some of the things you mention climate change, vaccinations, food quality I must agree. There is more I agree with you and of course there are things I just say, OK!
Post a Comment