"And there is a better way to control population than to withdraw the one effective agent against one of the worlds biggest killers and that is to raise the standard of living of the poorest. That has long been a moral imperative since the time of Our Blessed Lord himself it has been a moral imperative that we help Our Lord’s the sick and Our Lord’s the poor. And we work for them and we raise them up and we make them healthy and we make them wealthy, because if we make them wealthy, then their populations will stabilize. This is something that every demographer knows perfectly well . Make the population wealthy and it stabilizes. Keep it poor and it will continue to increase. Make it poor if it was wealthy, and it will start to increase again. And if the environmental left were really serious about saving the planet from a huge CO2 footprint (which I will show doesn’t matter at all) then the first thing they would do is pursue policies that would not, as the extinction of five sixths of your economy would do, make you poor. They would be trying to make everybody rich."
You felt compelled to take down this ninny's mugshot two weeks ago after having sourced it from the least flattering possible article available and getting called out for it - at that time.
Why you back to repping this fool now?
Stop insulting the intelligence of your constituents by constantly scraping the bottom of the barrel promoting a "diversity of idiocy" rather than the diversity of ideology you claim to represent.
The Federation beams Lieutenant Commander Geordi La Forge played by Levar Burton Malthus onto the bridge of The Starship Enterprise to Attack-The-Messenger & Ignore-The-Message.
(Notice Levar offers not one point of contention with any particular point contained in the the message ... just slavish obedience to the orthodoxy of Plantation Science, shrouded in the forced sarcasm popular among geeks.)
Unflattering article? Removed picture because of what?
LOL. Ya trippin' nerd.
You've been playing too much Dungeons & Dragons Levar. You can't seem to discern your little Malthusian fantasies from reality.
You got a more relevant meme regarding the Climate Change / World Government hoax? Drop a link:
The purpose of this report is to imagine the unthinkable – to push the boundaries of current research on climate change so we may better understand the potential implications on United States national security.
We have interviewed leading climate change scientists, conducted additional research, and reviewed several iterations of the scenario with these experts. The scientists support this project, but caution that the scenario depicted is extreme in two fundamental ways. First, they suggest the occurrences we outline would most likely happen in a few regions, rather than on globally. Second, they say the magnitude of the event may be considerably smaller.
We have created a climate change scenario that although not the most likely, is plausible, and would challenge United States national security in ways that should be considered immediately.
While the content of this release raises the alarm, Marshall is sending multiple messages. The timing of the Fortune article, for instance. For a man of Marshall's long legacy of discretion to directly challenge the current administration's line on global warming at the beginning of a presidential election year speaks volumes. That he chose to do so by releasing a report by respected business consultants in Fortune magazine seems to say he wants the business world, Bush's most important constituency, to understand clearly that the status quo is untenable.
This extraordinary act by a senior Defense Department official implies high-level recognition that the Bush administration's resistance to the near global consensus on climate change"a consensus that includes the vast majority of the scientific community, many corporations including General Motors, Alcoa, IBM, DuPont, Johnson & Johnson, and all the remaining governments of the OECD"is a threat to national security itself. Indeed, last month in the journal Science, the United Kingdom's Chief Scientific Advisor declared that "climate change is the most severe problem that we are facing today"more serious even than the threat of terrorism." Perhaps inoculating itself from future criticism the report states, "Many scientists would regard this scenario as extreme. . . But history tells us that sometimes the extreme cases do occur, there is evidence that it might be [occurring] and it is DOD's job to consider such scenarios."
And that resistance has been staunch. In the battle over climate change, according to a report from the group Environment2004, the Bush administration has both misrepresented the science and misled the public. According to The New York Times, the Bush administration acted to distort and omit EPA findings on global warming. The group notes that the administration has dismissed the findings of the International Panel on Climate Change set up by the first President Bush and the findings of a panel of the National Academy of Sciences that Bush himself requested. They document how administration has tried to mislead the public by substituting the absolute indicator of total emissions with emissions per unit of GDP, which can go down while total U.S. emissions continue to rise"and then asking emitters (unsuccessfully) to voluntarily commit to reducing emission intensity. And they highlight how the administration has stalled the debate by calling for a research agenda which The New York Times described as a "redundant examination of issues that had largely been settled, bereft of vision, executable goals and timetables"in short, little more than a cover-up for inaction."
"resistance to the near global consensus on climate change"a consensus that includes the vast majority of the scientific community, many corporations including General Motors, Alcoa, IBM, DuPont, Johnson & Johnson, and all the remaining governments of the OECD"is a threat to national security itself."
near? global? consensus?
When the fuck did that become science?
That's what I'm talking about.
Even the A Students conformists. Just verbose conformists.
Scratch so stuck on stupid conspiracy theories, he's become too dense to see what's sitting there in plain sight.
What does it tell you when the Pentagon's father of strategic planning asserts something in direct contradiction to the sitting administration's policy and practice?
"What does it tell you when the Pentagon's father of strategic planning asserts something in direct contradiction to the sitting administration's policy and practice?"
"What does it tell you when the Pentagon's father of strategic planning asserts something in direct contradiction to the sitting administration's policy and practice?"
"What does it tell you when the Pentagon's father of strategic planning asserts something in direct contradiction to the sitting administration's policy and practice?"
Rub those two feebly functioning brain cells of yours together,
squeeze as hard as you can,
and try to answer the kwestin in the context of U.S. history within your own lifetime and U.S. history as it's unfolding directly in front of all our eyes.
It would be interesting to see what this polemicist has to say now that the conference in Copenhagen has ended with a non-binding accord—nothing that even approaches Kyoto/1997.
To even mention Barack Obama and communism is oxymoronic.
Most of the organizations on the left are extremely disappointed with the Copenhagen Accord.
If the Nobel War Criminal was truly interested in the global environment he should start by ending these senseless wars and reducing his war machine in general. What are the odds that will happen?
[The US Department of Defense is the largest polluter in the world, producing more hazardous wastes than the five largest US chemical companies together. Hazardous wastes employed by the military include, among others, pesticides and defoliants, like Agent Orange, many solvents, petroleum, perchlorate, lead mercury and depleted uranium.
Health problems associated with these toxins include miscarriages, low birth weight, birth defects, kidney disease and cancer. Most affected are those on whom such weapons are used, those in the military, and those who live near a military site. In the US one out of every ten persons lives within ten miles of a military site listed as a priority cleanup site.
Many corporations are right up there with the DoD. So, then, why are their fellow conspirators the ones wording such legislation? The best argument in favor of the environment, I conclude, is also an argument against war. Therefore any true and honest environmental movement has, at its core, an argument against war!
Depleted Uranium (DU) has been a hot topic since the war began, similar to Agent Orange use in Vietnam. As a radioactive and chemically toxic heavy metal, it remains wherever it is lodged, in the body on the ground or in rivers, for decades. In the human body particles of depleted uranium are a source of alpha particles. Much research suggests that DU is linked to serious damage to the human body.
In Iraq alone hundreds of tons of Depleted Uranium have been fired and exploded in high populated areas such as Basrah, Baghdad, Nasriya, Dewania, Samawa, and other cities. Exploration programs have found Depleted Uranium related contamination over most Iraqi territories.
Iraq’s Minister of Environment said in July of 2007 in Cairo that “at least 350 sites in Iraq are contaminated with Depleted Uranium.” She also said that Iraq is facing an unprecedented number of cancer cases and called on the international community to help Iraq alleviate this problem.] -- Justin O'Connell
"Oh Shit! ... GMO Food Sterilizes People ... And It's Really A Form of Population Control?"
"There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment. How often, or on what system, the Thought Police plugged in on any individual wire was guesswork. It was even conceivable that they watched everybody all the time. But at any rate they could plug in your wire whenever they wanted to. You had to live—did live, from habit that became instinct—in the assumption that every sound you made was overheard, and, except in darkness, every movement scrutinized."
INTELLECTUAL INSURRECTIONISTS
Alexander King, Bertrand Schneider - founder Club of Rome - The First Global Revolution, pp.104-105
"In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill ... All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself."
Were We All Kunta Kinte? Or Are We Also Mansa Musa?
Plantation Negros & The New World Order
Illuminati Want My Mind Soul & My Body - A DV Joint
Barry Goldwater 1909-1998
"Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. And moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue. "
Robert Mugabe Speaks To Thunderous Approval At Harlem's Mount Olive Baptist Church
The Honorable Elijah Muhammad
"It Is Easier To Change A Man's Religion Than It Is To Change His Diet"
Private Prison Industry
2,000,000 human beings in American prisons and counting
IS THIS LITTLE GUY A PERSON?
The founders of the American state understood that the proper functioning of a democracy required an educated electorate. It is this understanding that justifies a system of public education and that led slaveholders to resist the spread of literacy among their chattels. But the meaning of "educated" has changed beyond recognition in two hundred years. Reading, writing, and arithmetic are no longer sufficient to decide on public policy. Now we need quantum mechanics and molecular biology. The knowledge required for political rationality, once available to the masses, is now in the possession of a specially educated elite, a situation that creates a series of tensions and contradictions in the operation of representative democracy.
Greater Display of Conspicuous Consumption?
"Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth.”
Margaret Sanger. Woman, Morality, and Birth Control. New York: New York Publishing Company, 1922. P
"We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population. and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members."
Louis Pasteur
"The Microbe is nothing. The terrain is everything."
A DV JOINT
Ask Denmark Vesey
DenmarkVesey1822@hotmail.com
Chris Hedges Warns of The Dangers of The "New Atheists" and "Secular Fundamentalists"
Beverly Johnson. Beverly Hills. 1978
Do You Consider Yourself:
"Bra! Tell Me About It!"
"Most of the trouble I have had in advancing the cause of the race has come from Negroes."
Is President Barack Hussein Obama The Driving Force Behind US Policy?
Ted Turner - CNN founder and UN supporter - quoted in the The McAlvany Intelligence Advisor, June '
"A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal."
Lord Bertrand Russell, The Impact of Science On Society (Routledge Press: New York, 1951).
"At present the population of the world is increasing at about 58,000 per diem. War, so far, has had no very great effect on this increase, which continued throughout each of the world wars.. War has hitherto been disappointing in this respect, but perhaps bacteriological war may prove effective. If a Black Death could spread throughout the world once in every generation, survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full. The state of affairs might be unpleasant, but what of it?"
Denmark Vesey For President 08
1. Troops Out Of Iraq Immediately. Like By Monday. 2. Money Owed To Haliburton and War Contractors Be Given Directly To The Iraqi People 3. Complete Electoral Reform 4. No Corporate Conglomerate Will Be Allowed To Control More Than 5% Of News Market 5. Federal Reserve Abolished 6. For-Profit Prison Industry Abolished
*George Orwell (1903-1950) English novelist, critic
Men can only be happy when they do not assume that the object of life is happiness... If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear... The great enemy of clear language is insincerity... The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it... To see what is in front of one's nose requires a constant struggle... For a creative writer possession of the truth is less important than emotional sincerity.
“The technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society will be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values.” – Zbigniew Brzezinski
God Don't Make No Mistakes
Subscribe Via eMail
Gordon Parks 1912-2006
"I suffered evils, but without allowing them to rob me of the freedom to expand."
16 comments:
"And there is a better way to control population than to withdraw the one effective agent against one of the worlds biggest killers and that is to raise the standard of living of the poorest. That has long been a moral imperative since the time of Our Blessed Lord himself it has been a moral imperative that we help Our Lord’s the sick and Our Lord’s the poor. And we work for them and we raise them up and we make them healthy and we make them wealthy, because if we make them wealthy, then their populations will stabilize. This is something that every demographer knows perfectly well . Make the population wealthy and it stabilizes. Keep it poor and it will continue to increase. Make it poor if it was wealthy, and it will start to increase again. And if the environmental left were really serious about saving the planet from a huge CO2 footprint (which I will show doesn’t matter at all) then the first thing they would do is pursue policies that would not, as the extinction of five sixths of your economy would do, make you poor. They would be trying to make everybody rich."
Wow
Beelzebub,
You felt compelled to take down this ninny's mugshot two weeks ago after having sourced it from the least flattering possible article available and getting called out for it - at that time.
Why you back to repping this fool now?
Stop insulting the intelligence of your constituents by constantly scraping the bottom of the barrel promoting a "diversity of idiocy" rather than the diversity of ideology you claim to represent.
the peasants of this world cant stop the inevitable.....
As if on cue^^
The Federation beams Lieutenant Commander Geordi La Forge played by Levar Burton Malthus onto the bridge of The Starship Enterprise to Attack-The-Messenger & Ignore-The-Message.
(Notice Levar offers not one point of contention with any particular point contained in the the message ... just slavish obedience to the orthodoxy of Plantation Science, shrouded in the forced sarcasm popular among geeks.)
Unflattering article? Removed picture because of what?
LOL. Ya trippin' nerd.
You've been playing too much Dungeons & Dragons Levar. You can't seem to discern your little Malthusian fantasies from reality.
You got a more relevant meme regarding the Climate Change / World Government hoax? Drop a link:
Gave it to you two weeks ago Scratch.
That'd be the article about master Pentagon planner Andrew Marshall detailing warsocialism's plans and preparations (THE Meme) for climate change.
Find it, read it, and learn...,
DV:
The Copenhagen conference exposed their hand all too clearly.
Be prepared for the "Black Nationalists" to go on the attack and call people like you "Sellouts".
They will accuse you of sucking up to Uncle Sam rather than accepting these "reparations" in what ever form they come in.
Why do you stand against the brown skinned people around the world DV?
An Abrupt Climate Change Scenario and Its Implications for United States National Security
October 2003 - By Peter Schwartz and Doug Randall
Imagining the Unthinkable
The purpose of this report is to imagine the unthinkable – to push the boundaries of current research on climate change so we may better understand the potential implications on United States national security.
We have interviewed leading climate change scientists, conducted additional research, and reviewed several iterations of the scenario with these experts. The scientists support this project, but caution that the scenario depicted is extreme in two fundamental ways. First, they suggest the occurrences we outline would most likely happen in a few regions, rather than on globally. Second, they say the magnitude of the event may be considerably smaller.
We have created a climate change scenario that although not the most likely, is plausible, and would challenge United States national security in ways that should be considered
immediately.
Tom Paine provides the metanalysis...,
While the content of this release raises the alarm, Marshall is sending multiple messages. The timing of the Fortune article, for instance. For a man of Marshall's long legacy of discretion to directly challenge the current administration's line on global warming at the beginning of a presidential election year speaks volumes. That he chose to do so by releasing a report by respected business consultants in Fortune magazine seems to say he wants the business world, Bush's most important constituency, to understand clearly that the status quo is untenable.
This extraordinary act by a senior Defense Department official implies high-level recognition that the Bush administration's resistance to the near global consensus on climate change"a consensus that includes the vast majority of the scientific community, many corporations including General Motors, Alcoa, IBM, DuPont, Johnson & Johnson, and all the remaining governments of the OECD"is a threat to national security itself. Indeed, last month in the journal Science, the United Kingdom's Chief Scientific Advisor declared that "climate change is the most severe problem that we are facing today"more serious even than the threat of terrorism." Perhaps inoculating itself from future criticism the report states, "Many scientists would regard this scenario as extreme. . . But history tells us that sometimes the extreme cases do occur, there is evidence that it might be [occurring] and it is DOD's job to consider such scenarios."
And that resistance has been staunch. In the battle over climate change, according to a report from the group Environment2004, the Bush administration has both misrepresented the science and misled the public. According to The New York Times, the Bush administration acted to distort and omit EPA findings on global warming. The group notes that the administration has dismissed the findings of the International Panel on Climate Change set up by the first President Bush and the findings of a panel of the National Academy of Sciences that Bush himself requested. They document how administration has tried to mislead the public by substituting the absolute indicator of total emissions with emissions per unit of GDP, which can go down while total U.S. emissions continue to rise"and then asking emitters (unsuccessfully) to voluntarily commit to reducing emission intensity. And they highlight how the administration has stalled the debate by calling for a research agenda which The New York Times described as a "redundant examination of issues that had largely been settled, bereft of vision, executable goals and timetables"in short, little more than a cover-up for inaction."
^^ ...
...
...
...
... and?
"resistance to the near global consensus on climate change"a consensus that includes the vast majority of the scientific community, many corporations including General Motors, Alcoa, IBM, DuPont, Johnson & Johnson, and all the remaining governments of the OECD"is a threat to national security itself."
near? global? consensus?
When the fuck did that become science?
That's what I'm talking about.
Even the A Students conformists. Just verbose conformists.
lol..,
Scratch so stuck on stupid conspiracy theories, he's become too dense to see what's sitting there in plain sight.
What does it tell you when the Pentagon's father of strategic planning asserts something in direct contradiction to the sitting administration's policy and practice?
"What does it tell you when the Pentagon's father of strategic planning asserts something in direct contradiction to the sitting administration's policy and practice?"
... both sides of the fence.
stahooopidmuhfuggahs
"What does it tell you when the Pentagon's father of strategic planning asserts something in direct contradiction to the sitting administration's policy and practice?"
... a nonevent.
"What does it tell you when the Pentagon's father of strategic planning asserts something in direct contradiction to the sitting administration's policy and practice?"
... Randian Malthusists playing email footsy.
Randian?!?!
rotflmbao...,
jigaboo,
stop playing.
now concentrate.
Rub those two feebly functioning brain cells of yours together,
squeeze as hard as you can,
and try to answer the kwestin in the context of U.S. history within your own lifetime and U.S. history as it's unfolding directly in front of all our eyes.
It would be interesting to see what this polemicist has to say now that the conference in Copenhagen has ended with a non-binding accord—nothing that even approaches Kyoto/1997.
To even mention Barack Obama and communism is oxymoronic.
Most of the organizations on the left are extremely disappointed with the Copenhagen Accord.
If the Nobel War Criminal was truly interested in the global environment he should start by ending these senseless wars and reducing his war machine in general. What are the odds that will happen?
[The US Department of Defense is the largest polluter in the world, producing more hazardous wastes than the five largest US chemical companies together. Hazardous wastes employed by the military include, among others, pesticides and defoliants, like Agent Orange, many solvents, petroleum, perchlorate, lead mercury and depleted uranium.
Health problems associated with these toxins include miscarriages, low birth weight, birth defects, kidney disease and cancer. Most affected are those on whom such weapons are used, those in the military, and those who live near a military site. In the US one out of every ten persons lives within ten miles of a military site listed as a priority cleanup site.
Many corporations are right up there with the DoD. So, then, why are their fellow conspirators the ones wording such legislation? The best argument in favor of the environment, I conclude, is also an argument against war. Therefore any true and honest environmental movement has, at its core, an argument against war!
Depleted Uranium (DU) has been a hot topic since the war began, similar to Agent Orange use in Vietnam. As a radioactive and chemically toxic heavy metal, it remains wherever it is lodged, in the body on the ground or in rivers, for decades. In the human body particles of depleted uranium are a source of alpha particles. Much research suggests that DU is linked to serious damage to the human body.
In Iraq alone hundreds of tons of Depleted Uranium have been fired and exploded in high populated areas such as Basrah, Baghdad, Nasriya, Dewania, Samawa, and other cities. Exploration programs have found Depleted Uranium related contamination over most Iraqi territories.
Iraq’s Minister of Environment said in July of 2007 in Cairo that “at least 350 sites in Iraq are contaminated with Depleted Uranium.” She also said that Iraq is facing an unprecedented number of cancer cases and called on the international community to help Iraq alleviate this problem.] -- Justin O'Connell
Post a Comment