What's wrong with this picture? The signs are in English. Not Farsi. Notice the organized ubiquity of the "Where Is My Vote" slogan. Like a Gap ad. Or the "Save Darfur" head fake they had Plantation Negros worked up about 2 summers ago.Undercover Black Man said...
Hey, DV. Maybe those signs are in English because that photo was taken in London, England. Do you think that's a possibility?Why do you do these things, youngblood? Why do you persist in making yourself sound like a lunatic?
Denmark Vesey said ...
... The mind of the Plantation Negro never ceases to amaze me.Yes Undercover Black Man. That is the point. Why would people who voted in Iran, be looking for their votes ... in London? Why would you lobby a Farsi speaking government, in English?
Isn't that like black people whose '04, US Presidential votes were thrown in dumpsters in Ohio, looking for those votes in Mexico, with protest signs written in Spanish?
Last week the Iranians were the most oppressed people on the planet. Under a religious dictatorship. Now they are waging a revolution on Twitter. Now compassionate up-to-the-minute coverage seeps via CNN into the meme-stream of Plantation Negros like an IV drip.
Previously Plantation media only showed Ahmadinejad looking like a dictator, religiously repressed women and sinister looking Ayatollahs, when using images to frame the Plantation Negro / Cracka worldview of Iran.
Now all of a sudden. Heifers all out in the street. Nails done. Hair did. We're showered in HD Ready For MTV images of young sexy Iranians all wearing the same made in China green revolutionary outfits. Looking like Abdul Che Muhammad.
The green and white Moussavi poster is only missing the word "HOPE" to make the Plantation Negro mind fugg complete.
The funny thing is the Plantation Media is covering the election "protest" in Iran better than they covered the election protests right here on the Plantation. Where was the color coordination for the anti-Iraq war protests David?David. You should know that he who controls the images, can make things look the way they want. If the Plantation wanted you to support the Iranian elections they would spoon feed you this:
Kel D said...
I agree that the message is being manipulated.When the US elections were disputed, I knew all the details of machines and queues and illegal activity... and still no one put up a fight.
For the Iranian one, all I know is that people seem to be putting up a fight and nothing about why they think the election was unfair.
It all reminds me of Eisenhower era politics. A nice president (We like Ike!) orchestrating violent coups in socialist foreign nations.
So, Iran will have a civil war and be unable to continue with its nuclear programme then?
51 comments:
Hey, DV. Maybe those signs are in English because that photo was taken in London, England. Do you think that's a possibility?
Why do you do these things, youngblood? Why do you persist in making yourself sound like a lunatic?
Here is some video of an Iranian protest in London, in which you can see those green "Where Is My Vote" signs.
So, people who voted in the election flew to London to protest the results?
^ Is it news to you that Iranian expats overseas were allowed to vote in the Iranian election? It's shocking to me that you didn't know that.
Associated Press: "Iranian expatriates and their children living in the United States cast ballots Friday in the Middle Eastern country's heated presidential election...
"Voters around the country gathered at 41 election sites, mostly at hotels and mosques staffed by volunteers."
Pissed-off Persians been protesting in Los Angeles as well.
DV,
If it were in Farsi nobody in the rest of the world would have any clue as to what was going on. The signs are in English because they want the world to bear witness. This is kind of obvious.
Do you put any thought into these posts are are you just flinging as much shit as you can to see what sticks? If you were really up on things, you'd be asking why Western media is calling Mousavi a reformer when his history suggests he is just as "hardline" as Ahmandinejad (hardline is from a U.S. perspective...which doesn't mean that much to me). Are they any different? Is one better for the educated elite and the other for the poor? Maybe Mousavi's changed? Why is the west's knee jerk reaction to jump on Mousavi's bandwagon? Personally, I say the Iranian election is an internal issue, the world should watch, but keep out of it. But if you want to raise the alarm and talk about head fakes, signs in English is kind of weak...whether in London, LA, or Tehran.
Do you put any thought into these posts or are you just flinging as much shit as you can to see what sticks? If you were really up on things, you'd be asking why Western media is calling Mousavi a reformer when his history suggests he is just as "hardline" as Ahmandinejad
Ding!Ding!Ding! That's what happens when you have a dualist view of events. It reduces all complexity.
"Ding!Ding!Ding!" Sub
LOL. Come on. You cats can't be serious.
"If you were really up on things, you'd be asking why Western media is calling Mousavi a reformer when his history suggests he is just as "hardline" as Ahmandinejad"
LOL. "Western media"?
West of what?
Sad to say, but... your game is slipping, DV.
Best stick to giving the faggots hell.
Don't be simple. Everyone knows on a spherical planet directions are subjective. But you know very well what I mean when I say Western (by convention) Media. Comment on the question.
Come on Mills. Stop frontin'. You know this school. Let Doc come to bat. I'm tired of striking you out.
"But you know very well what I mean when I say Western (by convention) Media. Comment on the question." DMG
DMG!
Actually, Doc, I have an idea of what you mean when you say "Western" media. But I don't think you know why.
Is there an example of Eastern media?
Can you post a link?
You can't.
The "Western" construct is part of the historical narrative that has you thinking Egypt is not a product of Africa and people who question drinking monkey virus juice are just "flinging shit".
The Plantation calls Mousavi a "reformer" for the same reason they call abortion "choice".
Plantation Negros / Crackas respond to it.
...are you trying to buy time with this inane tangent on east and motherfucking west, when everyone in the room knows what we are talking about or are you going to get to the substance of my comment?
And speaking of baseball analogies, that's what's known as a Balk.
"The "Western" construct is part of the historical narrative that has you thinking Egypt is not a product of Africa"
When have you ever read anything that I wrote that would suggest that I don't know Egypt (Kemet if you prefer) is anything other than from the continent and people known as Africa and African?
This is me taking hitting a triple.
"...and people who question drinking monkey virus juice are just "flinging shit".
This is me stealing (hell, I'm going to stroll...) home because you don't know how to field a ball...and for continually going to your old standby 'monkey virus juice' (which by my count is at least 3 times in the last 24 hours on subjects having nothing to do with vaccines).
Your ERA sucks.
You smart guys are not the only ones blogging! Maybe the post is a friendly reminder to watch the media constructively. I think is interesting the signs are in English. I think it's interesting how words like Revolution are being kicked around. DId we have one of those with Gore and Bush? Good post...
Your ERA sucks.
Oop. Time for DV to start rhyming again.
Anon,
Even "Death to America" is written in English. You can't kick the media for everything.
"When have you ever read anything that I wrote that would suggest that I don't know Egypt (Kemet if you prefer) is anything other than from the continent and people known as Africa and African?" DMG
"Jesus was a part of the culture he grew up in. The man was Jewish. He was not African." DMG
Undercover Black Man said...
Your ERA sucks.
"Oop. Time for DV to start rhyming again."
LOL. Uh oh.
Why you ... pseudo nouveau sumo lookin' Plantation Negro porno weirdo, you know my ERA is a Death Blow. .00000 is the ratio.
Now, Mills, since you've given up. Let Doc flow.
DV,
I believe Eminem grew up near the hood, does that make him black too?
I'll even spot you the divine conception. By Jewish law, you are what your mother is. But, perhaps you are saying Mary is not of the House of David? Or maybe you are saying she and everyone in the house of David was Egyptian or African? I'm interested to read your scholarship, other than some "they got you all mixed up" nonsense. It would seem that his disciples also had to be African too, since he had to be pointed out to the Roman soldiers, by Judas. Hey maybe all of the Israelites were black. Wow, now you have something there DV.
I believe (and my Bible is a tad dusty):
Rev. 1:14 His head and his hairs were WHITE like wool, as white as snow; and his eyes were as a flame of fire. (emphasis mine). The description is of his hair color, not the texture.
Now, Mills, since you've given up. Let Doc flow.
DMG'll get tired of it at some point, DV. Then what will you do to get attention?
LOL. Ahhhhh quit frontin' hater.
You here more than me.
You really don't think the forced sarcasm is fooling anybody do you?
Undercover Black Man mad because his little "Gotcha DV" moment was a dud.
But Doc is onto something. Go sit on the bench.
Actually guys, a rabbi came to our church some years ago as a guest speaker. He said that Jesus' lineage did have African from Mary's side, but by Jewish law, it comes through the mother. Jewishness is a culture. You can be African and Jewish, there are quite a few Ethiopian Jews out there and notwithstanding Sammy Davis Jr, the statement that Jesus was an African is not inconsistent with his Jewish heritage. But to be fair, we'd be applying the one drop rule if we said he was African.
Although Jewish law says it comes through the mother, from what I've read scientists haven't been able to find a common mitochondrial link between Jews. HOWEVER, they have been able to link Y chromosome data together from folks from South Africa to Palestine to Russia!
In that sense, perhaps it is proper to refer to Jesus as an African!
DV... hung up on the cats named Levy
and the fags and the Luminati.
Don't believe shit he see on TV
'cept the rappers he be jockin' on BET.
Get his ass tapped daily by DMG
and still think he deep enough to fuck with me!
Yo DV, go eat your veg-gies
while I grub on some scrapple and head cheese.
Yeah, I might get cardiovascular disease,
but when I die they'll still be talkin' 'bout me
and that article I wrote about PE.
And my days on "ER" and "NYPD."
And the show I created for NBC.
And other shit you can read about on IMDb.
So be glad we kickin' it digitally.
In real life, you'd be fetchin' my Snapple iced tea!
rotflmbao
comedy gold....,
Before the cooning mounts up another level DV, what you think about the long-legged mack daddy's speech in Cairo as a factor in all of this?
i.e., how much credit you think is being socked away for the purpose of lionizing our president as an international "change agent"? The "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" - legendary "pitchman" type a shit is written all over this joint.
I haven't heard many folks speak directly to this, but even prior to Obamas emergence on the national political scene, it was quite clear that whoever was coming next would serve on the basis of being able to articulate and carry off a fresh seeming governance narrative.
So Obama gives his speech to the Muslim world, and very shortly thereafter, all kind of well-funded, highly organized "mob" activity jumps off in Tehran shades of 1953.
It's this "politics by Benetton" looking eruption that you've generously cross-sectioned - that perfectly embodies Dopamine Hegemony.
imoho - it's only a matter of time now before our man starts accumulating additional build-up as a "great leader" - though the characterization "great leading man" would probably be far more accurate.
In this morning's WaPo; The administration's stance is practical -- the real power in Iran rests with Khamenei, not with whoever is president -- but pressure for a shift in policy will mount if the protests continue to grow and begin to threaten the government's hold on power. Obama already has been criticized -- notably by his Republican presidential rival, Sen. John McCain (Ariz.) -- as abandoning "fundamental principles" of support for human rights.
Khamenei, a former president of Iran who became supreme leader 20 years ago after the death of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, plays a defining behind-the-scenes role in Iran's complex and often opaque political system. His power derives from his support among the armed forces and the clerical establishment that presides over the nation's quasi-theocracy.
Given the fact that actual elite rule of Iran is via theocratic military dictatorship - the face that Iran's elites put on their "democratic" show is important.
It's not hard to understand why the Iranian public might have grown tired of Ahmadinejad's Bushite pose.
Ahmadinejad vs Mousavi is as close to a naked brand war as I've seen in a very long time outside the U.S.
Almost exactly like Obama vs Bush was a naked brand war here at home. Didn't nothing change in terms of the underlying system of warsocialist elite rule, just the face and the storytelling that lubricates the reality in the minds of the masses.
Matter fact, Obama and Gates will still be wrestling for a while to get the theocratic elements in the U.S. Armed Services back in check so that our own military diktat remains on a secular progressive organizational footing. Bush and Cheney had a ripsnorting dominionist hezbollization going on in the military. It's a very good thing they got busted out from within and that their adventurism proved to be a record shattering operational failure.
Speaking of vaccines, see this story.
Polio Vaccine Victim Wins Lawsuit Against Big Pharma.
Remember, this is the same media that refused to show practically any Muslims in London protesting the bombing of Gaza.
Ahmadinejad vs Mousavi is as close to a naked brand war as I've seen in a very long time outside the U.S.
No doubt they are the faces of the conflict but the real battle is between Rafsanjani, the head of the Council of Experts, and Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei.
Pepe Escobar points out--
On the other hand, here's the upgraded voice of the Tehran street, where the new top rallying cry is "Seyyed Ali Pinochet, Chile Iran nemishe" (Seyyed Ali Pinochet, Iran won't be like Chile). A seven-point list of demands has been Twittered and passed hand-to-hand (here in its original Twitter English version) since Tuesday afternoon.
1. Remove Khamenei from supreme leader because he doesn't qualify as a fair supreme leader.
2. Remove [President Mahmud] Ahmadinejad from president because he took it forcefully and unlawfully.
3. Put [Grand Ayatollah Hossein Ali] Montazeri as supreme leader until a review group for the ghanooneh asasi [constitution] is set up.
4. Recognize [losing presidential candidate Mir Hossein] Mousavi as the official president.
5. A government by Mousavi and start a reform of the constitution.
6. Free all political prisoners without any ifs and buts, right away.
7. Call off any secret organization such as gasht ershad [morality police].
The critical question is how will the Iranian Republican Guards Corps respond?
David. You should know that he who controls the images, can make things look the way they want.
Indeed, DV, Indeed.
BBC Uses Pro-Ahmedinejad Rally Photos As Photos Of Opposition "Protest"
Anon 9:29,
The critical question is how will the Iranian Republican Guards Corps respond?
How WILL the Republican Guards Corps respond? Is it a nexus of fundamentalist zeal standing ready to kill Persians, or, does it include a broad enough cross-section of moderation/common-sense to hold its fire or to compel its zealots to hold their fire?
Reason I ask, is because the U.S. Armed Services is in the process of trying to deal with a plague of dominionist zealots who came damn near to making the military ungovernable and may still pose a significant hazard to American elite rule.
The release of the American journalist by Iran last month was the signal that moderates within that country were willing and able to negotiate.
On June 4 Mr. Obama responded affirmatively:
The third source of tension is our shared interest in the rights and responsibilities of nations on nuclear weapons. This issue has been a source of tension between the United States and the Islamic Republic of Iran. For many years, Iran has defined itself in part by its opposition to my country, and there is in fact a tumultuous history between us. In the middle of the cold war, the United States played a role in the overthrow of a democratically elected Iranian Government. Since the Islamic Revolution, Iran has played a role in acts of hostage-taking and violence against U.S. troops and civilians. This history is well known. Rather than remain trapped in the past, I've made it clear to Iran's leaders and people that my country is prepared to move forward. The question now is not what Iran is against, but rather what future it wants to build.
I recognize it will be hard to overcome decades of mistrust, but we will proceed with courage, rectitude, and resolve. There will be many issues to discuss between our two countries, and we are willing to move forward without preconditions on the basis of mutual respect. But it is clear to all concerned that when it comes to nuclear weapons, we have reached a decisive point. This is not simply about America's interests. It's about preventing a nuclear arms race in the Middle East that could lead this region and the world down a hugely dangerous path.
I understand those who protest that some countries have weapons that others do not. No single nation should pick and choose which nation holds nuclear weapons. And that's why I strongly reaffirmed America's commitment to seek a world in which no nations hold nuclear weapons. And any nation, including Iran, should have the right to access peaceful nuclear power, if it complies with its responsibilities under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That commitment is at the core of the treaty, and it must be kept for all who fully abide by it. And I'm hopeful that all countries in the region can share in this goal.
The situation remains quite combustible and vulnerable to disruption on both sides. But by remaining relatively circumspect despite Republican agitation to do otherwise, the American team is allowing space for its counterparts on the Iranian side to maneuver.
Traveling abroad more than any other president in the first 100 days, Obama is Woodrow Wilson redivivus. And like the anti-colonial movements emerging from Paris 1919 there will surely be unforeseen and ricocheting outcomes but the overall trajectory seems clear.
That's good stuff Sub.
But I see it as a smaller part of another HEGEILIAN HEAD FAKE.
The destabilization of Iran is necessary to bring a bout the desired "Clash of Civilizations".
The Left v Right. The Lib v Conserv. The West vs East. The Christian v Islam. The Secular vs. Religious.
The plan is always to create the appearance of opposing forces and to herd the masses to a predetermined outcome.
This has nothing to do with the political abstraction of an Iranian election.
Look closely at the images of the "Uprising."
The Madison Avenue looking young attractive Iranians dressed in Fashionable revolutionary outfits stare off into the horizon, Che Guevara style.
The suggestion is that they long to be "free" of religious "restrictions".
When is the last time you saw any images of attractive young Iranians?
The Plantation Media has been as careful not to show humanizing images of Iranians as they are not to show flag draped coffins of US Soldiers.
Now all of a sudden all of Iran looks like a Beneton commercial.
This is not a political move.
This is the move of Secular Fanatics trying to accelerate their version of the apocalypse.
(Watch them produce a secular "messiah" figure to save the world in the next few months.)
As in 1919, the secular "messiah" figure is our own president. And he is hardly trying to steer toward a showdown.
"The relationship between Islam and the West includes centuries of co-existence and cooperation, but also conflict and religious wars. More recently, tension has been fed by colonialism that denied rights and opportunities to many Muslims, and a Cold War in which Muslim-majority countries were too often treated as proxies without regard to their own aspirations. Moreover, the sweeping change brought by modernity and globalization led many Muslims to view the West as hostile to the traditions of Islam."
The folks trying to hasten apocalypse are religionists and Dominionists.
and lest we forget the prize on which all eyes are fixated Sub.
As with Iraq, Iran sits on an ocean of mostly unexploited, sweet, light, crude oil.
The combined proven reserves of oil between Iran and Iraq tops out at in excess of 240 Billion barrels.
Which if my old eyes don't deceive me and I haven't lost a place point on the backlit screen, is somewhere around 17.3 trillion dollars at today's (not next year's) price per barrel.
Next year, that figure doubles or triples easily, and, the profit margins on it are staggering, above and beyond the excigent geostrategic fact that it's the last immense proven supply of easily extracted high-grade crude oil in the world.
while the political and ideological window dressing is very entertaining and a suitable distraction for those preoccupied with decoration - when everything is said and done - the killer-ape onslaught that must inevitably occur here will be triggered by the Obamamandian imperative to secure that oil for the benefit of anglo-american elites.
G-Dub and the boys had their chance and fubar'd it.
The long-legged mack daddy has his shot at it, using his preferred modus operandi, but at the end of the day, acquiring the prize is completely non-negotiable.
Politics, by definition, excludes piety. If a dyed in the wool McCarthyite and cold warrior like Nixon could negotiate with Soviet Russia and China and if the US can have normal relations with Vietnam after losing a twenty-five year war which covered four administrations both Republican and Democrat, I don't see why mofos can't work this out. The wild card as the POTUS alluded to when he said "But it is clear to all concerned that when it comes to nuclear weapons, we have reached a decisive point. This is not simply about America's interests." is Israel. A few trillion here or there or even possession of nuclear capabilities by a country half way across the world doesn't seem like a reasonable obstacle, but for a deeply insecure, suspicious, and fearful Israel......
Sub. That's very astute thinking. But like in the case with CNu. It is predicated upon some shaky assumptions.
CNu assumes the people who control, print, and lend the world's money supply - have a desire to make more money.
If they wanted more money, they'd print it. Or email from the Fed to the multinational banks who hold all of American's mortgages.
What they want is not money. They want power. Absolute power. Concentrated, centralized, global power over nations and over individuals.
World religions threaten the monopoly of power sought by global government.
Islam's gotta go.
Christianity's gotta go.
You seem to be operating under the assumption the president is really "the" president and the congress is still "the" Congress.
I submit to you my friend that our nation has experienced a coup.
Obama may as well be reading ransom notes.
Didn't he just read a really nice speech about "Indefinite Detention"?
Who you think wrote it?
CNu assumes the people who control, print, and lend the world's money supply - have a desire to make more money.
Wrong.
CNu KNOWS that money is merely a symbol for energy.
CNu KNOWS that there is one irreplaceable natural material energy source on which all industrialized civilization ABSOLUTELY depends.
CNu KNOWS that the struggle to control that resource (oil) is the sine qua non of elite conflict that will inevitably provoke the outbreak of WW-III and resultant massive human population die-off.
The only thing that CNu cannot say for certain is WHEN EXACTLY or WHERE EXACTLY in East Asia/Central Asia/Northeast Africa the regional exchange of nuclear strikes will commence.
Didn't he just read a really nice speech about "Indefinite Detention"?
Somebody has to lock up the bibtard domestic terrorists..., might as well be our president.
CNu KNOWS that there is one irreplaceable natural material energy source on which all industrialized civilization ABSOLUTELY depends.
Does CNu KNOW that there is a cheaper way of obtaining the natural material energy which all industrialized civilization ABSOLUTELY depends .. than nuking the people whose feet it is under?
With the money we spend "occupying" Iraq, we could have bought every teaspoon of oil they produced for 100 years.
If all that was wanted was Iranian oil ... the people who print money would just buy it.
The goal is not a transaction. The goal is confrontation.
It's the fulfillment of a secular / Luciferian occult apocalypse fantasy.
"For We Wrestle Not Against Flesh and Blood But Against Spiritual Wickedness in High Places"
You put up a post with the following title the other day; The Beginning of A Meme: As America Approaches Gestapo Levels of Surveillance - It's The Street Brothers Who Sound The Alarm.
I summed that joker up thus; end the privatizing of gains and the socialization of losses
Both practically and in principle - that statement conveys the entire reality toward which you handwave thus; The goal is not a transaction. The goal is confrontation.
It's the fulfillment of a secular / Luciferian occult apocalypse fantasy.
"For We Wrestle Not Against Flesh and Blood But Against Spiritual Wickedness in High Places"
I'm pressed for time, so a complete explanation will have to wait till a little later.
Or, if you want to know, you could hit my spot and search the term "egregore" the name "John Dee", or possibly the name "Paco Nathan".
One or more of these should take you directly toward the occultic crux of the matter, a crux which is radically different in its implementing details than that unstudied gobbledygook you've picked up from Livingstone.
It's a deadly serious problem alright - but the highly ambiguous and new-agey way in which you go about trying to characterize it is more harmful than helpful if your goal is to actually make people understand what they're up against.
I agree that the message is being manipulated.
When the US elections were disputed, I knew all the details of machines and queues and illegal activity... and still no one put up a fight.
For the Iranian one, all I know is that people seem to be putting up a fight and nothing about why they think the election was unfair.
It all reminds me of Eisenhower era politics. A nice president (We like Ike!) orchestrating violent coups in socialist foreign nations.
So, Iran will have a civil war and be unable to continue with its nuclear programme then?
"World religions threaten the monopoly of power sought by global government."
That is absolutely and historically untrue.
"World religions threaten the monopoly of power sought by global government."
Submariner said...
"That is absolutely and historically untrue."
Au Contrare Mon Frere
Peep the slow motion replay of the Hegelian Head Fake.
Picture a world of competing faiths ...
One faith disguises itself as a "non-faith"
Promotes "reason" instead of God.
Preaches the meme that the other faiths are oppressive.
Offers to "Liberate" and "Enlighten" it's adherents.
Unlike the other faiths that require adherents to modify behavior and to curtail their appetites, this new faith asks nothing of it's devotees. It encourages them to indulge their appetites and abuse their senses.
Soon the other faiths are weakened and discredited. There adherents drift away to become de facto members of this new faith.
This New Faith demands separation of church and state, which is really a way of monopolizing the tools of government.
As the other faiths verge on collapse this New Faith emerges as dominant and all powerful.
The symbolism and mythology of this New Faith becomes mandated by the state.
It will begin operating more as a religion again. Complete with dogma, ritual and thought control.
It wages crusade wars on what's left of the competing faiths.
The New Order Has Become The New Faith. It's God is dark.
Corporations hijack human brains for their own purposes and then add the propaganda costs to the price of the products they sell.
It's a three-legged problem: energy, instincts, realpolitik.
Meaningful social change is simply not possible until human rights are removed from corporations.
Step #1 to effect meaningful change.
Overturn the 1886 Supreme Court decision Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad.
Get corporations OUT of the propaganda business! (then DV would be out of work)
This will require political opposition to the status quo in the US on a scale that has never been seen before.
Far greater than the opposition to the Vietnam War.
How can that political turmoil occur if corporations and brand-swaggering negroes have hijacked the brains of nearly every body in the West?
Denmark Vesey the nimiety of your eccentricities is truly entertaining. Thankfullly, you and your co-religionists have been on the losing end since 1533. Plus we've had recorded history past and present to tell us that life isn't better your way.
If you get a chance go to C-SPAN BookTV archive and view John Lukacs's talk last week in which he says that people of Catholic faith will have to become accustomed to their original role as a minority living in the catacombs.
Denmark Vesey the nimiety of your eccentricities is truly entertaining.
rotflmbao.....,
Submariner is school for Denmark Vesey. {an'a nucca relly need to get a David Livingstone/Alex Jones/Henry Makow correspondence course tuition reimbursement too!}
LOL.
Damn Sub.
You still falling for the head fake.
You really don't realize you are practicing a religion do you?
I thought you'd be the first to come around.
The Secular Jihad continue ...
STAY TUNED
Lol ... Ahhhhhhhh
That's funny C.
You boys always crack me up when you pretend you don't know you are in school.
Like vaccines aint a sacrament.
Like the charade in Iran is over something as simple as oil.
Well it's Friday. You know what that means.
Get ready for a quiz.
Inoculation or vaccination in America was first practiced by African slaves. It has been practiced in India and China since antiquity.
The authoritative point of view
You were not mistaken, truly
Post a Comment