Byrdeye said...
Farrakhan is a very bright, gifted man. Ridiculous propaganda like this is why I stopped reading the Jewstream news. TIME is one of the worst.Of course, they must paint him as a sinister figure of RAGE...and caption him as anti-Jew first and foremost...and then anti-White.
But minister of rage??? How abou minister of TRUTH!!! TIME is full of Jew writers and "journalists." Everything they write about the rest of the world is similarly grossly-distorted.
56 comments:
If they are trying to pass it off as journalism, it is not.
Like or dislike Farrakhan this is not an acceptable cover caption and all journalistic objectivity goes out the window before you even get a chance to open up the cover.
Boo.
I love Farrakhan...
Farrakhan is a very bright, gifted man.
Ridiculous propaganda like this is why I stopped reading the Jewstream news. TIME is one of the worst.
Of course, they must paint him as a sinister figure of RAGE...and caption him as anti-Jew first and foremost...and then anti-White.
But minister of rage??? How abou minister of TRUTH!!!
TIME is full of Jew writers and "journalists." Everything they write about the rest of the world is similarly grossly-distorted.
Cosign Classical One, any attempt at journalistic integrity and objectivity has been discarded from inception.
This is the last gasp y'all. Here is a link to my brother appearing on the NewsHour as a respected historian among other respected historians offering his interpretation of electoral history. He is not a custodian of the black intellectual discourse.
But such a politics of custodianship has well-served the old vanguard of black political tradition and their reactionary foes who sought to demonize (Farrakhan), isolate (Garvey), or physically eliminate (King/Shabbaz) them.
The irony here is that the Jewish media lives up to the very criticisms that Farrakhan makes of them here.
As being bold-faced, totally-biased, distortional, Zionist racist propagandists.
I don't think this is Jewish thing at all Byrdeye, I know the Jews don't like Farrakhan but do you think the rest of white america does? What do you think Farrakhan would think about you Byrdeye?
Classical One,
Most Whites in America believe whatever Jews tell them to believe - including you.
That's why the KKK is a "terrorist" organization even though the ADL and AIPAC are a "civil rights" group and a "lobby".
That's why Whites dismiss David Duke, but take their political talking points from Wolf Blitzer.
That's why many Whites boo at Mel Gibson while spending millions on Steven Spielberg movies.
That's why most Whites believe Islam is waging war on Christianity, even though ADL/AIPAC-funded ACLU lawyers fight to the death to keep Christmas out of schools, God out of the pledge of allegiance and the Ten Commandments out of courtrooms.
So I guess it is now the global system of Jewish supremacy?
Only supreme over those White people who are voluntary dupes. Arabs and Muslins have been hip to their game for a long time.
Which explains why they get such treatment in the media.
You shouldn't blame whole groups of people for your problems, no whole race or religion is any one way.
Of course not Classical.
Weren't you the one blabbering, a week or two ago, about how "Muslims" (apparently, all 1.2 BILLION of them) want to make "Western" women wear burkas?
"You shouldn't blame whole groups of people for your problems, no whole race or religion is any one way."
You also shouldn't turn a blind eye to undeniable patterns either...if the shoe fits, wear it.
I mean, for a minority group that is just a few % of our population, why does all this racist propaganda and political manipulation on the national scale always lead back to them, time and again?
Sure, it'd be different if TIME was run by Latinos, and The Jew Yorker by Albanians...and the shyt was more evenly-distributed...but for krissakes are the Jews waaayyy over-repped in this.
II is absolutely 110% right on all this. No need to cut Heebs a free pass just cuz they proclaim themselves to be YHWH's "chosen ones" (a wholly racist concept in itself).
Wait a minute is this the current Time issue out now on newsstands?
It was the Feb. 28, 1994 issue.
Weren't you the one blabbering, a week or two ago, about how "Muslims" (apparently, all 1.2 BILLION of them) want to make "Western" women wear burkas?
Nope and why would I? They have no power to do that, I've got better things to to worry about.
Classical One said...
on Jun 12, 2008 1:30:00 PM
Just so you know the Muslims would make us exchange the bikini for the burka and believe me, you wouldn't like it.
Nice try though.
A muslim government in America might do that, things would certainely change that's for sure. Is that going to happen, no. I went to Pakistan two years ago, bathing suits were not allowed on women in the water parks. Do you think most Americans would like that? I don't, hence my comment. I could care less what they do in their countries as long as it doesn't effect me and it doesn't.
Note how easily the discussion here deteriorated into tribal recriminations. We went from what constitutes appropriate standards for professional journalism to trying to decipher the role of Jews. The politics of sectarianism is quite seductive.
Ok, ok, I get it.
Your generalizations about Muslims are ok because you went to Pakistan two years ago, but any generalizations about Jews are bad?
Endless talk about Jews on here, how often do i go bringing up Muslims? I don't blame my problems all on Muslims, or Jews, or white or black people. Women, Jews and gays are not reponsible for most of the worlds problems.
^ I could make an arguable case that they (Jews) are most responsible per capita.
Their bodycount certainly far exceeds that of any other group by an incomparable amount.
Except white people
Women, Jews and gays are not reponsible for most of the worlds problems.
Ok Classical, then who is?
People in general, we are a destructive and self destructive species. It isn't confined to one group.
"Except white people"
How so? Jewish Commies and Communism killed well over 100 million in a few decades of the 20th century alone.
I don't think you can find a comparable genocide of that magnitude anywhere else by any other group in our recorded history.
byrdeye said...
"Except white people"
How so? Jewish Commies and Communism killed well over 100 million in a few decades of the 20th century alone.
I don't think you can find a comparable genocide of that magnitude anywhere else by any other group in our recorded history.
[Jeopardy Music]
?
Those European Jews were white people the last time I checked, Judaism is a religion and not a race.
"Judaism is a religion and not a race"
Wrong.
There is a Jewish ethnicity, the descendants of Judah.
Hence, someone can still be of Jewish descent, yet not Judaic in beliefs. See secular Jews or...what was that guy's name, Jesus?
Or vice-versa.
Judaic religion and Jewish ethnicity are not one and the same.
Just another smokescreen they use to confuse the issue and hide behind...
------------------
I don't think you can find a comparable genocide of that magnitude anywhere else by any other group in our recorded history.
[Jeopardy Music]
?
*crickets*
BTW, let's not also forget that Hitler was the grandson of a Rothschild...so you can see the behavior that the worst in this type of lineage produces time and again..."Stalin," "Lenin," "Trotsky," "Marx," "Hitler," "Freud," etc. All mass destructionists using mass propaganda and ideologies to manipulate and control the masses. And many typically using vague pseudonyms that help cloud their Jewish heritage.
Put a Jew next to your average European and could you tell the difference? I can't.. Byrd you are tripping out on this info you get from Neo facist groups man, it's not good. What happened to you? Did some jews kill your parents or something? Where does all the hate come from?
"Put a Jew next to your average European and could you tell the difference? I can't"
Really? So, you can't tell any notable difference between Jerry Seinfeld or Howard Stern and say, Dolph Lundgren?
Anyhow, I keep rebutting your weak excuses and showing you the facts, which you keep overlooking and accusing me of personal bias instead, etc. Why are you so irrationally defensive of them? What's your personal problem?
The vast majority of anthropoligsts don't consider Jews a race. Dolph Lundgren looks much different than even you average Euro that has brown hair and dark eyes. You should be asking yourself why you talk about jews constantly and how they somehow end up at the root of every issue along with feminists.
"You should be asking yourself why you talk about jews constantly and how they somehow end up at the root of every issue along with feminists"
My views are congruent with, and a simple product of, the facts. Which I've already presented to you at every turn and you cannot deny. Hence, you simply resort to ad hominem attacks, instead. Because you cannot rebut the facts with...facts.
Yet, your beliefs still lie in opposition. So, you should ask yourself why you willfully ignore the facts to hold a non-congruent opinion? What are they really based upon...if not the facts?
Brain-washed with propaganda-induced confirmation bias much?
What did I deny? The vast majority of anthropoligsts don't consider "Jew" to be a race. Europeans are Europeans, do you think the subject of this post would see a diference between Jews and Europeans? No they are all devils to him. Be careful who you call friend Byrd.
Classical,
If I may ...
In order to advance your point, you are going to have to face Byrd's fundamental tenet:
"There is an obvious concentration of power in the hands of a small group of people, who are leveraging their power to advance their own interests and impose their prejudices upon the majority. This small group of people has been able to accomplish this by carefully managing the opinions and perceptions of the gullible majority. One of their tactics is to present themselves as a "religious group" and to take refuge behind our instinctive tendency towards tolerance.
Imagine if Tony Soprano and his crew of criminals and extortionists called themselves "The Italian Catholics" ... instead of "The Mafia".
They would be much more difficult to criticize and to prosecute. No?
A small group of mostly secular monopolists has made their religion the focus - not their monopoly. Clever, no?
Some people feel a Zionist Magazine's slanderous representation of Minister Farrakhan is like a Mafia Magazine slandering the District Attorney.
- Self Serving.
Byrd seems to contend that well intentioned people like you have been duped. That you exhibit a Pavlovian conditioning to summarily reject anything critical of Jewish political, economic and media hegemony.
Whether that is true or not - you should address it.
There is an obvious concentration of power in the hands of a small group of people, who are leveraging their power to advance their own interests and impose their prejudices upon the majority. This small group of people has been able to accomplish this by carefully managing the opinions and perceptions of the gullible majority. One of their tactics is to present themselves as a "religious group" and to take refuge behind our instinctive tendency towards tolerance.
You could say the exact same thing about "white people" ask Mike, I'm sure he will tell you. Do you think we really have an instinctive tendency towards tolerance? What planet is that from? Not from this one. Jews have been hunted, killed, and peresecuted everywhere they have been. They stick together because they realize the consequences if they do not. Jews have had enormous success as well, so they are hated and envied becuase of it. Judaism is a religion, there are black Jews and Indian Jews and Asian Jews, all who are Jewish. They do not impose there prejudices on us, we have imposed ours upon them. Even people like Byrd who probably looks very close to your European Jew would never accept them.
Good point Classical.
But let's look a little further.
This commentary was written by Rabbi Neuburger of "Jews Not Zionists".
Here is what he has to say:
"The greatness or worth of a person is not measured by his or her outward appearance. Jews believe that Adam was created in G-d's image and that he is the common ancestor of all mankind. At this stage in human history, there is no room for privileged people who can do with others as they please. Human life is sacred and human rights are not to be denied by those who would subvert them for "national security" or for any other reason. No one knows this better than the Jews, who have been second-class citizens so often and for so long. Some Zionists, however, may differ. This is understandable because Judaism and Zionism are by no means the same. Indeed they are incompatible and irreconcilable: If one is a good Jew, one cannot be a Zionist; if one is a Zionist, one cannot be a good Jew."
-
Here is what Farrakhan's chief spokesperson said the now deceased Khallid Muhammed said about Jews and whites.
"I know some of y’all want to be in a family with white folks: "It’s not
right to leave white people out. We’re all one family." That is a lie. We are
not one family! … I’m here to tell you that God has a people, that God has
chosen a people. And it’s not some hooked-nose, bagel-eatin’, lox-eatin’,
perpetrating-a-fraud, just-crawled-out-of-the-caves-and-hills-of-Europe,
so-called, wannabe, imposter Jew! You are the true Jew! You are the true
Israelite!....
He [Malcolm X] said if you find one good [white person], kill him first
before he turns bad. Because he’s only faking."
The Jewish person who wrote that about Zionism should know that when people refer to Zionists being destroyed, they usually mean Jews in general. Brother Khallid happened to be more honest than most and would tell you what he really was thinking.
DV - I couldn't have said it better myself...
Jews have been hunted, killed, and peresecuted everywhere they have been
Lol...why do you keep sounding like a Talmudic Mafia commercial? Fact is quite the opposite. Jews have enjoyed the greatest concentrations of wealth in their host countries from their global diaspora. Often offering nothing in return but parasitic political strangling and takeover. Only reason there's bloqback is after they've utterly destroyed a country and people finally wise up to their shenanigans.
BTW, the Opium dumping and War in China was a Jewish monopoly by the end. 100 million Chinese died as a result of this profiteering. So, add that to the Commycide of well over 100 million...and you have well over 200 million killed by JEWS within the past 2 centuries alone.
And YET, you say THEY are the persecuted ones? That is so ignorantly backwards that it is actually horrifically OFFENSIVE.
They do not impose there prejudices on us
BS!!!!!!!! They expect tolerance from all others, but themselves are tolerant ONLY of their own. See Israel for a prime example.
Believe me, Jews are VERY conscious of their own tribe versus others (shiksas, goyim, etc).
NOI bodycount: handful at most (as far as I know)
Jewish bodycount: > 200 million in recent times
Actions speak much louder than words, C1...
"The Jewish person who wrote that about Zionism should know that when people refer to Zionists being destroyed, they usually mean Jews in general." Classical
See man.
It's stuff like that makes people wonder if they are putting drugs in Noah's bagels or something that has Goyim repeating propaganda like that.
Classical suggesting Zionism is the same with Judaism is like saying Nazism is the same as Christianity.
C1 ... I sincerely challenge you ... sincerely to read the rest of the Rabbi Neuburger's statement:
http://www.jewsnotzionists.org/differencejudzion.html
Jews have been hunted, killed, and peresecuted everywhere they have been.
Assuming this is even true (doubt it), have you ever wondered why that is?
If we were talking about an individual and that person complained incessantly about discrimination, getting fired from every job he got just because of his race, getting evicted from his home just because of his race, getting treated badly by his neighbors just because of his race - at some point wouldn't it be fair to ask the question of what he was doing to bring that situation upon himself? Everywhere. For thousands of years.
The Armenians have been in a similar diaspora and, other than in Turkey at the end of WWI, have always had good relations with the host countries even though they tend to stick to themselves, etc., etc.
Why the difference?
I have a good friend who is Jewish, his family has treated me very well and I attended his Bat Mitzvah. I can attend Jewish temple but I would never be allowed into an NOI Mosque. I can convert to Judasim but no white person can ever be a member of the Nation, so who is more tolerant?
C1 is obviously not interested in an intellectual debate about the truth.
For some reason, he is already deeply & personally emotionally vested in Jews.
Hence, he dodges all the hard facts and engages in cheerleading slogans and childish antics to tapdance around the harsh reality.
I'm sorry you doubt that Insurgent, the history of Europe alone is complete with pogroms in nearly every country. In the late 60 years the Nazis and the the Communists under Stalin hunted Jews.
I have a good friend who is Jewish, his family has treated me very well and I attended his Bat Mitzvah.
Ahh, and whoop there it is.
I knew there was an emotional lens blinding all his rational thought...
Thing is, personal friendships and geopolitics are NOT mutually exclusive. I don't hate Jews on a personal level, I treat them as individuals. In fact, if you start judging entire groups of people based on just a few individuals, you are committing a huge errror.
C1, Stalin was a Jew.
In the late 60 years the Nazis and the the Communists under Stalin hunted Jews
Uh, "Stalin"'s real name was Iosif Djugashvili - and he was a JEW, you moron! What do you think I've been saying this whole time!
Evil Jews hiding behind fake Anglicized names? Yet you are so blinded, you haven't even been listening and fell for their very ruse I've been pointing out!
DAMN. Hard head as hell. Eyes blind as bats. Another sucka under the spell of Heebnotism.
C1 - I sincerely implore you to do some indy research on this topic. I have a 7-post brief series starting here - simply connecting the dots that they won't in any US history class.
Look, DV, II, Farrakhan and myself are no simpletons...
We are also not blind haters, either.
But, if we and even a guy like David Duke can all agree on the same thing...well, don't you think there might be something to it? Think about that - the head of the Black Muslims and an ex-KKK member agreeing on something. Who would normally be at odds with each other. What then are the chances unless there's really something to it? An objective basis observable to any and all witnesses?
There is no historical consensus that Stalin was a jew, even if he was, he killed jews in great numbers so he obviously wasn't on their side. Ever heard of the doctor's case?
http://www.scribd.com/doc/2020184/1953-Stalin-and-the-plot-agains-the-jewish-Doctors
even if he was, he killed jews in great numbers so he obviously wasn't on their side.
Well, if he was, then it's hard to argue about how mean the Christian Whites are and extract all that guilt and reparations from them when you're getting murdered by your own. No?
Last names do not automatically denote a certain religion or ethnicity. Would one guess that Paula Abdul is Jewish by her name? The most authoritative biographies on Stalin, including the seminal book by Alan Bullock, "Hitler and Stalin: Parallel Live" do not point to Stalin as a Jew. The most popular charges of Stalin being a Jew come from the neo Fascist right, not surprisingly.
Saw this video of the "persecuted" earlier today -
http://ads.vidsense.com/r/149/l/ov6g95
Joseph Stalin - who changed his name to Stalin (a very Jewish habit) from his real name Joseph David Djugashvili - in the Georgian language "shvili" means "son of" or "son" while "djuga" means "Jew". Even the man believed to be his real father - David Papisnedov - was also a Jew. Interesting that this fact is not mentioned in the recent book on Stalin by Simon Montefiore, a Jew himself, and a descendant of the Moses Montefiore who en 1846 with Rothschild began to implement the idea of a home for the Jews in Palestine.
And most popular charges of "Stalin" not being a Jew come from the liberal left, not surprisingly.
Besides, tell me this is not a Jew:
16
37
Notice any similarities with this modern Jew?
Notice the same slanted-in brows and fiendish, demonic grin... >:)
Post a Comment