Friday, March 14, 2008

The Paris Hilton School of Motherhood. 30+ Women Substituting Dogs For Children


Bitch. Get a baby.

Mariah Carey chats about motherhood:


“Obviously, having a kid is a commitment for life. I really would have to be very, very positive that I was in a place where I could completely focus and put everything into the job of being someone’s mommy, because it’s hard enough to have a puppy.”

Well Mariah, are you very, very positive that you are in a place where you can afford to be cavalier about ever becoming a mother?

How hard would it be, to never be someone's mommy? How hard is it to substitute a chihuahua for a child?

The instinct for human beings to mother, father and create families took a million years to evolve and 40 years of television to destroy.

Women pacifying their motherly instincts with dogs must appear to other beings as odd as polar bears caring for penguins instead of cubs.

Radical feminism marketed the notion that women would find true fulfillment, happiness and power outside the family. A couple of generations of women have been prepared to do everything but become wives and mothers. High school girls are taught more about condoms than breast feeding.

Hence we have a nation of botox addicted, Paula Abdul looking women walking around kissing dogs in the mouth.

26 comments:

Anonymous said...

Yeah, this dog shit is out of hand! LOL @ "bitch get a baby."

Anonymous said...

Media and the availability of birth control have made women feel that one has to be "perfect" before they have a baby. You have to have the perfect job, perfect house, perfect hubbie BEFORE you become a Mom. It's pathetic.

J.C. said...

This site really anti women. Except for a sick religious version.

With the man patting them on the head.
Why... ?
Because this site wants to control.
Why ?
Because they think they have a big weenie?
Women are not fooled by control freak men.
They know they can control them through fear.
Female sexuality has always freaked out control type religious dissemblers.
Yawn...

Denmark Vesey said...

Yeah yeah Skip ...

Of course. Acknowledging the desire of women to be mothers is "anti-woman".

Mocking the substitution of dogs for children is "control".

You bought into that Lesbo-FemiNazi bullshit years ago and still believe it.

What the fuck do you know about women anyway? Do you have one? Are you raising one?

You think because you play cheerleader for female promiscuity makes you pro-woman?

You pompous neo-liberal secular fanatics are played out.

That's why the world laughed at Gloria Steinem's irrelevant ass when she tried to stoke the fire of gender war just yesterday.

You know a site more pro-woman than denmarkvesey post a link.

I'm just not pro the type of gender blurred woman you pseudo-gay liberals have been selling for the past 40 years.

If you were pro-woman, you would marry one, bond and create life.

You just want to engage in mutual masturbation and proselytize for the Holy Church of Technocracy.

-

J.C. said...

You make my point perfectly belief system fanatic.

Babylon figured out how to control comic genius's like you and you are a soldier for them.

How gay is that?

Anonymous said...

I'd probably think this was an anti-woman post too if one of my best friends wasnt a walking example of this phenomena. She "hates" men, but feeds her dog chicken breast and brown rice and has health insurance for her.

J.C. said...

Why begrudge a women... if that means owning a dog.
Control freak city.
Ok.. so maybe you are listening to Rev. Dollar.. or Hagee.. or the Late Great Planet Earth.

Religious babble speak.
By the way... Technocracy as you put it... is not a religious movement. It is a science movement.
But you do not own a dictionary and can not figure out what secular means. Can you ? Rhetorical question. Ha ha.
How is it one can equate science as a belief system when...
a belief system is supported by nothing more than an opinion. --- Science is nothing more than the prediction of the next most probable.--- Any belief system is supported by nothing except imagination, while the next most probable is supported by observation of some phenomenon that can be recreated under the same conditions by anyone, at any time and the result will be the same. This is Science. This is how fact is established.--- One can imagine anything, however it can only become Science when it can be measured i.e. detected either directly or remotely. Failing this it simply does not exist.

This is not an effort to vex you brother. Just point out a fact is all.

Denmark Vesey said...

Robyn,

Peep the game of the secular thought police:

The point of this post is not "anti-woman", it is anti-meme.

It is a rejection of the superwoman anti-mother chick with a diamond-on her-right-ring finger, happy without-a-man propaganda thats shoved down our throats in school and in the media.

No, this is post is not anti-woman at all.

It is simply contrary to the TYPE of women promoted by the increasingly intolerant secular, corporate, neo-liberal anti-family social engineers like Skip.

Instead of invoking the gender card, why doesn't Skip simply compare and contrast the relative sense of fulfillment and satisfaction reaped by the notion of femininity promoted by the Gloria Steinem ("motherhood is drudgery" and "marriage is control"), "girls should fuck as much as men" - to the age old model of women who achieve power and fulfillment from motherhood and from within the family.

Noooooo ... nobody wants that discussion.

They dictate WE ARE TO ASSUME Paula Abdul is more fulfilled with two chihuahuas than Michelle Obama is with two daughters.

And to challenge that assumption is "anti-woman".

That's Orwellian propaganda, not woman's rights.

J.C. said...

Oh that is funny Robyn. You got those men right by the balls. I am sure you dress your little ones for maximum status when you go to the Devil worship church of Babylon.

Women love to control men. I bet you bake the cookies at church also... and talk about god giving you a blessing of ''money''. Yes Rev. Dollar.
The oldest game in town.
Contract Prostitution.
Har har.

Denmark Vesey said...

Skip,

Do you have a wife or daughter?

Even a girlfriend?

Why does the celebration of motherhood, marriage, sexual prudence and children threaten you so much?

Secular fanatics like you, with dwindling spiritual resources, mocking religion are like deaf people mocking music.

-

Anonymous said...

No, no, no.

Who among us wants Paris Hilton to reproduce?

Who wants someone to have a child when they think of living things as fashion accessories?

Who wants to trust a baby to someone who thinks a dog can go anywhere a purse can go?

Who wants to ignore a woman when she says she isn't ready to take care of a child?

Please, let's keep Paris Hilton and her ilk just as they are. They are perfect role models for my daughters -- as shining examples of what not to be.

J.C. said...

""Do you have a wife or daughter?

Even a girlfriend?

Why does the celebration of motherhood, marriage, sexual prudence and children threaten you so much?""

That would be telling... besides why personalize this. My point is my point. You think I am against mother hood ? Apple pie ?
All I am saying is some chick that likes to get gang banged is just as good as one that goes to church and prays to imaginary god and gives the real preacher her fake money.
Thats all.
Oh and may be the chick just likes to get it on with 4 guys.
That does not make her a bad girl.

Anonymous said...

Damn a. Charles,
That is one hell of a point.

But no worries. DV ain't Cpt. Save A Ho. I'm General Acknowledge The Obvious. The lap dog phenomena is indicative of a failed feminist mantra that sold a devalued notion of motherhood and matrimony.

DV

Anonymous said...

Oh! Here you are my brother, DV, in your unedited, unabridged, unabashed glory! I haven't seen you at TSO for a while.

I should have made my way to your blog LONG ago.

"Bitch. Get a baby!" LOL!

Judging how you laid into Skip, you must have been holding back where we disagreed....Thanks!

Big Wayne

Anonymous said...

Yeah Wayne, I was wondering what took you so long.

All-Mi-T [Thought Crime] Rawdawgbuffalo said...

somebody had to do it, but i cant even write about her or that Britney dame

Intellectual Insurgent said...

Women pacifying their motherly instincts with dogs must appear to other beings as odd as polar bears caring for penguins instead of cubs.

One of the best things I've read in a while.

J.C. said...

How is it that so many people seem to hate mans best friend ?
You'all better hope you never get buried in an avalanche.

Do you know how many dogs have saved people by awakening them during fires... or alerted others to people having heart attacks ?

Dogs help the lost get tracked in the wilderness.
One of the true marks of a well rounded human is if they are kind to animals.

Besides obviously there is a sexual connection to women with the whole dog thing.
Some of these little dogs may be better.. than putting up with the patriarch shit from the bible thumping control masters.

Anonymous said...

"Besides obviously there is a sexual connection to women with the whole dog thing. Some of these little dogs may be better"

End of discussion. Right there. What else is there to say to someone who "understands" beastiality?

CNu said...

dayyum...., just as he was fixin to talk about how peanut butter gets into the mix with the little dogs and their human consorts...,

J.C. said...

Dogs love peanut butter.
But then they like to roll in shit also.
A dog will never bullshit you.
Ha.

Denmark Vesey said...

Yeah Robyn, Yuck.

Fanatical secularists like Skip have been sold a base notion of heaven that cannot imagine pleasure beyond some vile fucky sucky nastiness like he just introduced to this discourse.

Skip is spiritually retarded, but he's still my favorite white boy.

Anonymous said...

You can have him. Even his sentence structure is weird.

J.C. said...

Thats because I ain't like you bro.

I don't wanna be like anyone else.

Ya gotta rap your brain around it a little bit.

Its not Sponge Bob. or Smurf.

Hey... I was just sticking up for Mans best friend. There is a lot of animal dislike... here abouts.

Sentence structure.?. Man .. thats really cold. Ha.

Denmark Vesey said...

Big Wayne!

What up dude? You never been through here before?

Ahhhh lil Bra. You will never see the world the same again.

Holla at your boy.

Lola Gets said...

Ok, um, wow. See, I would use the example of dog-owning women in a different argument. Yes, I do feel its a way to pacify ones maternal instinct, but I wouldnt say that women do it becasue they dont want to be wives and mothers, or theyre trying to live up to the superwoman ideal. Id chalk it up to the fact that they arent in a place where they feel they can have children.

Ideally, I only want to have a child/children (both birth and adopted) if I were in a good marrieage. But I aint. So, Im refraining from childbearing/adopting because Id want my child to have the benefit of a loving, two-parent household.

Now, Im not blaming men for this fact - but thats my reality.

Now I know "Home Economics" is, or was, taught in high schools, but dude, I dont think breast feeding ever was. That just might be a wee bit too advanced, lol.

L