Why can you not bring ONE legitimate scientist to back up your nutty ideas? Every single source in every single argument you bring up is either some random cat off the street who got some fake credentials, gets the most basic things incorrect, and never comes with any reproducible evidence. But, if you prefer to get your information from comic book writers, that's on you. I prefer to get my information from people who have...well, you know actually conducted geological research....I'll let you fuck around with the ignorant cats you dig up online.
You are trying too hard. Just like you had to come hear to learn about Bechamp, now I got to teach you about Otto and Herndon.
Dude, Do your own discovery....You are not in the same ballpark in so many areas and instead of just saying I don't know "jack" about that subject and move on, you continue to play yourself.
"In 1929, a Cal-Tech astronomer named Edwin Hubble observed that objects which appeared to be much further away showed a more pronounced shift towards the red end of the spectrum. Scientists building on Hubble's discovery concluded that the farther an object was away from Earth, the faster it was receding, and calculated the relationship between distance and velocity, called the "Hubble Constant" and concluded on the basis of this one observed fact and the assumption that there was no other explanation for that observed fact that the universe was expanding."
So, you are quoting Cal-Tech. Have you ever been to Flagstaff, AZ? It's actually a very nice place. A neighbor of mine is an Astrophysicist and will likely be at this Conference. Maybe you should attend and ask a room full of scientists to debate you on the subject of an "expanding Earth" model. Who knows, maybe you'll "enlighten" them, and they'll ask you to get up on the podium to speak.
If you are interested in debating some other scientists or doctors on the other subjects you've brought up over the last year, I'll be MORE than happy to send you conference information. Usually they are in some interesting venues. Bring your wife, make a vacation out of it. You can get up and ask questions on any topic you like. So, how about it Wax...you ready to bring your show on the road to debate the big boys? You must be bored talking to me.
Eddie can do it in 2 mins:) :
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxVg3zIfvAo&feature=player_embedded#!
This is for the non believers.:)
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lGAQwQTNueE&feature=fvw
Eddie might also be talking to you.
Why can you not bring ONE legitimate scientist to back up your nutty ideas? Every single source in every single argument you bring up is either some random cat off the street who got some fake credentials, gets the most basic things incorrect, and never comes with any reproducible evidence. But, if you prefer to get your information from comic book writers, that's on you. I prefer to get my information from people who have...well, you know actually conducted geological research....I'll let you fuck around with the ignorant cats you dig up online.
ReplyDeleteDMG , Come on Bra, get a life.
ReplyDeleteYou are trying too hard. Just like you had to come hear to learn about Bechamp, now I got to teach you about Otto and Herndon.
Dude, Do your own discovery....You are not in the same ballpark in so many areas and instead of just saying I don't know "jack" about that subject and move on, you continue to play yourself.
Ever heard of “Ottland” after Ott C. Hilgenberg?
Never heard of geophysicist J. Marvin Herndon?
DMG,
This ain't new.
http://lastblogonearth.com/2010/03/24/forget-pangaea-local-scientist-says-its-all-about-ottland/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dave-maass/report-suggests-plate-tec_b_512358.html
Otto came up with major studies in 1933 to prove expanding earth back then.
Grow up dude.
Enjoy living in 1933.
ReplyDeleteeverything is expanding:
ReplyDelete"In 1929, a Cal-Tech astronomer named Edwin Hubble observed that objects which appeared to be much further away showed a more pronounced shift towards the red end of the spectrum. Scientists building on Hubble's discovery concluded that the farther an object was away from Earth, the faster it was receding, and calculated the relationship between distance and velocity, called the "Hubble Constant" and concluded on the basis of this one observed fact and the assumption that there was no other explanation for that observed fact that the universe was expanding."
So, you are quoting Cal-Tech. Have you ever been to Flagstaff, AZ? It's actually a very nice place. A neighbor of mine is an Astrophysicist and will likely be at this Conference. Maybe you should attend and ask a room full of scientists to debate you on the subject of an "expanding Earth" model. Who knows, maybe you'll "enlighten" them, and they'll ask you to get up on the podium to speak.
ReplyDeleteIf you are interested in debating some other scientists or doctors on the other subjects you've brought up over the last year, I'll be MORE than happy to send you conference information. Usually they are in some interesting venues. Bring your wife, make a vacation out of it. You can get up and ask questions on any topic you like. So, how about it Wax...you ready to bring your show on the road to debate the big boys? You must be bored talking to me.