SPOTS

Friday, March 30, 2012

Global System of White Supremacy? Demarcus and Taniqua Ware Adopt White Baby Girl

Demarcus, Taniqua and LeQuisha Ware. After 3 unsuccessful pregnancies the Dallas Cowboy Pro Bowl linebacker and his wife were thrilled to be able to adopt a needy child.
Anonymous said...
First, DV, thank you for busting this myth of global white supremacy. There is some form of supremacy -- whether it be religious, financial, political, etc. -- no matter where you go, even when everyone seems to be exactly the same on the surface. Admittedly though, many people have neither the time nor the will power to really do homework on the issues, take any personal responsibility for one’s actions and circumstances, or view the world from outside a narrow ignorant perspective.

Ignorance truly is bliss. Not to mention, blaming some unified ethereal white global conspiracy is quick, easy, and convenient -- all valued commodities nowadays.

Second, Thordaddy, please expound upon this evil of “deracinating a child”. I will assume that was hyperbole because that is like saying the earth is flat. Speaking in such broad generalities ignores all the complexities of an issue in the context of real life.

If we follow that logic, then there should be no mixing of cultures whatsoever and all people should be separated by narrowly defined cultural and racial lines. Even if that is what you actually want, that logic still disintegrates under the slightest scrutiny. There are no examples of any culture or people that are not the result of cultural and genetic admixture unless that culture has been isolated and unchanged since either man and ape parted ways or god created man. However you look at it, it is a baseless assumption.

As you further explain your hypothesis, please consider the following scenarios: would it be deracinating for a hearing family to adopt a deaf child, a Christian family to adopt a child from a Hindu country, a Jewish family to adopt a gentile child, a Japanese family to adopt a Chinese or Korean child, a Hutu family to adopt a Tutsi child? There is a vast and convoluted spectrum of subtle differences that do not fit within your rigid statement. Perhaps it depends on your definition of race and culture (please define). That is my perspective at least and I am interested in the scholarship of yours. --OneLove

43 comments:

  1. Finally...whew...Watch the plantation spin...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Lol, nobody wants a black baby. Not their own daddies, or black foster parents.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is just not a feel good story for me. I can only think of all the little, beautiful Black children looking for a monny & daddy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That was very ignorant of you. Are you insinuating that black babies are in more need than white babies. And if thats true whos fault is that. There are children of all different races who need help. You must be a racist black person.

      Delete
  4. Is it a feel good story for you when white celebrities adopt little black babies?

    ...

    ...

    Every time Madonna snatches up a new pet ... she passes up on a 'beautiful white baby'.

    Why the difference?

    Why the reflex among both blacks and whites to think there is something "wrong" when black parents adopt a white child?

    Is it not a subconscious capitulation to the assumptions of "White Supremacy"?

    Doesn't that kind of thinking throw gasoline on the illusion of "White Supremacy"?

    "White Supremacy" exists in the heads of Plantation Negros because they perpetuate it by assuming the memetic role of needy victim.

    When white celebrities choose to publicly adopt a black baby ... you don't hear white people on the radio and in the blogsphere planting the meme that "Nobody Wants White Babies!".

    Why?

    Because even that argument lessens the perceived value of white babies.

    ReplyDelete
  5. If anyone ever doubted that football damages your brain cells...

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think my main concern is with the Black babies. I want them to be taken care of. I want them to have opportunities in life. Whether they have a black or white adoptive family, I want them all to have a chance.
    It breaks my heart to see little Black boys & girls in so much hurt.

    White children are born with privileges, the tone is set for their future. I just want to see my little Black children with an opportunity to live a life full of hope, health joy. I cannot see those opportunities in an adoption center being overlooked until you’re 18 and turned out to the streets.

    When a white celebrity adopts a Black baby, the white blogsphere don’t hollar, because they know there are plenty of white families lined up waiting to adopt a white child. Taking care of their own.

    And there are so many Black children available for adoption, my question for that couple would be, why not?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Absolutely unbelievable another anonymous racist.....you obviously know nothing about the ways of the world when you say something so ignorant like insinuating that white children get things handes to them on a silver platter...well you are sadly mistaken and need to learn how to be a little wiser when the words you use ...maybe black people like you (I'm assuming you are because of youre comments) are the reason some black children go nowhere...education is the key to success

      Delete
  7. "This is just not a feel good story for me. I can only think of all the little, beautiful Black children looking for a monny & daddy."

    "Lol, nobody wants a black baby. Not their own daddies, or black foster parents."


    That's gonna be the spin if it already hasn't been. That's who we'll hear from

    ReplyDelete
  8. Listen Anon youre wrong. That's why you're here. Learn. You sound like one of my chicks that Ive paid tuition for.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anon: Tell me where I'm wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I dont get it. Why on earth would they do this, if they indeed had a choice?

    On another note however, I have seen this in real life. Its hilarious b/c the white child actually ends up Black and if you close your eyes, you would never know you were listening to anything other than a Black child. The whole nature vs. nurture thing. Its crazy.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Why the difference?


    Because there is a farrr higher supply (and lower demand) for black babies since the majority of them are born as "orphans" without fathers. Therefore black babies are muuuch more easily available - which is why many whites will rather adopt a black baby than wait 10 years for a white one.

    Whereas with this couple, they would rather wait 10 years (or more like pay an enormous surcharge) for a white baby than get a black one far quicker and cheaper.

    Same as Michael Jackson. Given the choice privilege - blacks prefer white babies.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Yes DV, but the consistent stand is to reject both forms of self-aggrandizement at the expense of the child.

    Deracinating a child is an evil thing and the radically autonomous thing to do.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Deracinating a child is an evil thing and the radically autonomous thing to do.

    Only in the mind of a worthless peasant for whom "racial" identity is a prized possession.

    ReplyDelete
  14. First, DV, thank you for busting this myth of global white supremacy. There is some form of supremacy -- whether it be religious, financial, political, etc. -- no matter where you go, even when everyone seems to be exactly the same on the surface. Admittedly though, many people have neither the time nor the will power to really do homework on the issues, take any personal responsibility for one’s actions and circumstances, or view the world from outside a narrow ignorant perspective. Ignorance truly is bliss. Not to mention, blaming some unified ethereal white global conspiracy is quick, easy, and convenient -- all valued commodities nowadays.

    Second, Thordaddy, please expound upon this evil of “deracinating a child”. I will assume that was hyperbole because that is like saying the earth is flat. Speaking in such broad generalities ignores all the complexities of an issue in the context of real life. If we follow that logic, then there should be no mixing of cultures whatsoever and all people should be separated by narrowly defined cultural and racial lines. Even if that is what you actually want, that logic still disintegrates under the slightest scrutiny. There are no examples of any culture or people that are not the result of cultural and genetic admixture unless that culture has been isolated and unchanged since either man and ape parted ways or god created man. However you look at it, it is a baseless assumption.

    As you further explain your hypothesis, please consider the following scenarios: would it be deracinating for a hearing family to adopt a deaf child, a Christian family to adopt a child from a Hindu country, a Jewish family to adopt a gentile child, a Japanese family to adopt a Chinese or Korean child, a Hutu family to adopt a Tutsi child? There is a vast and convoluted spectrum of subtle differences that do not fit within your rigid statement. Perhaps it depends on your definition of race and culture (please define). That is my perspective at least and I am interested in the scholarship of yours. --OneLove

    ReplyDelete
  15. Now that I'm done laughing hysterically (because I was waiting for this to happen after the latest black baby acquisition by Sandra Bullock) I will say that I do think there is something wrong with this. I wish I could be more we are the world about it, but I just have a problem with a black couple choosing to adopt a newborn white baby over a black child that is more likely to end up in foster care for life. I should ask them to pay the cost for me to adopt a black child to right their wrong. Because I've wanted to for years but I can't afford it!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your an evil racist and an ugly person inside and out

      Delete
  16. I'm more troubled by the fact that this little white girl's name is LaQuisha.....

    ReplyDelete
  17. lol ...

    Sash / CNu

    I'm just messing with ya'll.

    I made that part up.

    Shiii ...

    They probably named the baby "Kennedy".

    Or "Morgan".

    "Chandler".

    Some shit like that.

    But ...IFFFFF ... the baby is named Taniqua / Shaniqua / LeQuisha ...

    I'm fallin' the fuuug out.

    ReplyDelete
  18. The baby's name is Marley, after Bob Marley.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Nah, OneLove... It makes me quite uncomfortable to know lil' homey will look up at some white alien and say what am I?

    When the paradigm says, "I can do whatever I want" then white folks adopting black babies and black folks adopting white babies is no more than this ethos in action.

    THE INTENT is to say race doesn't matter... And religion doesn't matter... And ethnicity doesn't matter... And nationality doesn't matter... And sexual orientation doesn't matter... In short, nothing matters except what I want.

    But of course, it's all a lie. A liberationist lie that attempts to destroy ALL RELATIONS and IMPEDIMENTS to its autonomy.

    It's going to matter no matter how much the radical autonomists say it doesn't matter. They say such things for a REASON, you know?

    ReplyDelete
  20. Well, if Mike Fisher was around, he'd ask you to explain this whole "race" thing.

    'Cause DV done already said his Black Supremacy meme does not conform to skin color, and blackness is more a state of mind than a color.

    So, what is "race" if not a created thing?

    Like religion.

    Like nationality.

    If something is created by man, then is it not under man's control? Is it not man's perogative to decide when to embrace it and when to reject it?

    Is it not man's perogative to determine whether it is important or unimportant?

    What makes race immutable?

    ReplyDelete
  21. Not that it makes any difference, but based on the latest pictures the little girl appears to be Hispanic.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Lil man,

    This isn't a question of "immutability."

    This is the assertion that cutting one off at the root doesn't matter.

    It's a radically autonomous assertion.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Braveheart should be required viewing for every illiterate peasant unfamiliar with his landless, rootless, rightless, and utterly expendable chattel history....,

    ReplyDelete
  24. "THE INTENT is to say race doesn't matter... And religion doesn't matter... And ethnicity doesn't matter... And nationality doesn't matter... And sexual orientation doesn't matter... In short, nothing matters except what I want.

    But of course, it's all a lie. A liberationist lie that attempts to destroy ALL RELATIONS and IMPEDIMENTS to its autonomy.

    It's going to matter no matter how much the radical autonomists say it doesn't matter. They say such things for a REASON, you know?"

    Preach

    ReplyDelete
  25. CNu???

    Irrelevancy
    spewing history
    got nothing to do with anything
    our conception
    ain't a rootless thing
    unless u play the game
    we all radically autonomous
    so at root we the same
    rootless and detached
    two ways sayin' the same thing
    cuttin' all relations
    smackin' down any impediments that get in the way
    that's yur way
    that's why u dangerous
    projectin' dopamine hegemony at night
    actin' dopamine hegemonic by day
    u radically autonomous
    u radically autonomous
    u radically autonomous, Craig...

    ReplyDelete
  26. lol!!!

    To the bone, to the bone.

    the more vehemently you peasants cling to your meaningless and artificial "identities" - the more willingly and the more thoroughly you'll do one another in over nonsense and superstition signifying nothing.

    look around yourself farce, consider the totality of your irrelevance.

    sheeeeiiiitttt......,

    aside from the short lived smell, nothing and no one will even recollect your passing....,

    ReplyDelete
  27. Craig,
    don't kid yurself, magne
    I'm creatin' this game
    movin' cats with my brains
    toldjew who u was
    I'm able, yur Cain
    u hurtin spiritually
    yur faith been slain
    it's evident in yur rebuttals
    u got nothing or everything to gain
    bi-polar existence
    just uh consequence of the autonomous meme...

    ReplyDelete
  28. rotflmbao...,

    Psychologists over the past 50 years have demonstrated the sheer genius people have at convincing themselves of congenial conclusions while denying the truth of inconvenient ones. You can call it self-deception, but it also goes by the names rationalization, wishful thinking, defensive processing, self-delusion, and motivated reasoning. There is a robust catalog of strategies people follow to believe what they want to. All this rationalization can lead people toward false beliefs, or perhaps more commonly, to tenaciously hang on to false beliefs they should really reconsider.

    Denial, to a psychologist, is a somewhat knuckle-headed technique in self-deception, and it is to merely deny the truth of something someone does not want to confront.

    ReplyDelete
  29. "This is the assertion that cutting one off at the root doesn't matter.

    It's a radically autonomous assertion. "

    Thordaddy is the truth!!!

    Today I was listening to Dr. Methaphsical himself Phil Valentine and he said the same thing - WORD for Word.

    He claimed that this is their biggest weapon...eliminate methaphysically via genetic manipulation all traces of the Ank-cestors(Roots). Having no relations to anything will get them to their goal. Went into great details on why GMO was important to their mission.

    Self Annihilation.

    ReplyDelete
  30. the more vehemently you peasants cling to your meaningless and artificial "identities" - the more willingly and the more thoroughly you'll do one another in over nonsense and superstition signifying nothing.

    look around yourself farce, consider the totality of your irrelevance.

    sheeeeiiiitttt......,

    aside from the short lived smell, nothing and no one will even recollect your passing....,


    Church right there.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Church?

    {burp}

    That ^ thur
    Uh single wrecked soul on uh terrible search
    Cheerleader for da self-annihilators
    Dood witha lotta self-hate
    Think his momma could kill'm
    Fo' he eva got out da gate
    Dood so cutthroat
    Cut his own throat for heaven's sake
    Mechanical consciousness
    Input/output like give n take
    This dood fake, but real
    No identity, many identities
    Swingin' from both side uh da plate
    Uppa at hometown buffet
    He hate on whitey's smorgasbord why he gettin' uh tenth plate,
    Dood hate on dopamine hegemony
    Why duh DOD puttin' food on dood's plate
    Feedin' his kids
    Subcontractin' for duh AMERICAN military state,
    Aight...
    That's tight,
    'Splain ya self boy
    What mask u wearin' tonight? 

    ReplyDelete
  32. During the 1845-65 Irish potato famine during which approximately 4 million Irish starved or emigrated, Ireland still produced abundant wheat crops. However, the land was English-owned and the crops were shipped out of Ireland.

    Between 1845 and 1912, the Irish population declined from 8 million to its historically stable number of 3 million.

    ReplyDelete
  33. ^^^Translation... CNu workin' for the biggest dawg on da block so he don't starve to death.

    ReplyDelete
  34. lol,

    Deracinating a child is an evil thing and the radically autonomous thing to do.

    racinating a peasant is an easy way to ensure that his simple ass will starve and die....,

    ReplyDelete
  35. Craig,
    I'm at home
    u alienated
    u tryin' tuh make things autonomous
    so I uh talented agent
    provocateur, some might think
    CNu, thatta TD creation,
    this dood spew simplicity
    u spew soulless degradation
    u averse to all relations
    but I still got that string
    that give Craig sensations
    he gettin' old, plump
    n full of reservation
    he done gave up on God
    now he soldier
    ready to cull this great big nation...

    ReplyDelete
  36. And the joy and freedom of divorcing myself from all that false identity - not having to be responsible for anyone but my true self. My *ethnic* identity??? Fuuuuuhhg them. What do I want their baggage for? I gotta make excuses for what they do? No way. They are what they are. I am what I am. I demand the full responsibility for my life. Not their lives. And nobody else is responsible for me - ever. And that God thing? He's an awfully silent witness. I expect we're good. If not, not a lot I can do about it.

    ReplyDelete
  37. God is only silent if you ain't listening.

    ReplyDelete
  38. I'm completely comfortable with that silence. Trust me...God's silence is more profound and meaningful to me than the jabberings of most of my very beautiful and delusional fellow beings.

    ReplyDelete
  39. How completely absurd some of the ignorant things you people say....god help your racist unintelligent souls..

    ReplyDelete